* Bastian Venthur:
> Maybe, but that was not my point. I somehow have the impression that
> some people think firefox is non-free (or sort of) just because Debian
> has to rebrand it.
I think you mean "unbrand". Including our own logo with similar
restrictions would be somewhat embarrassing.
-
Roberto C. Sanchez:
> There was some discussion about potential Firefox replacement
> names a few days ago on IRC. I suggested WaterBuffalo and Manoj
> and a couple of other people really liked it.
There also was an informal pool at
http://ze-dinosaur.livejournal.com/12539.html
with Iceweasel as
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 09:09:41PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Not sure what you mean. Firefox is free- and opensource. AFAIK they are
> only trying to protect their brand/trademark, which is IMHO ok, since
There is a difference of "protecting a brand" and "maximizing brand
value" ... there la
Marc Haber wrote:
> They also have an abysmally bad handling of security issues for
> everything that is not the latest and most shiny version. I don't know
> whether they're noticeably better for what they claim to support.
Maybe, but that was not my point. I somehow have the impression that
some
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 09:09:41PM +0200, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Not sure what you mean. Firefox is free- and opensource. AFAIK they are
> only trying to protect their brand/trademark, which is IMHO ok, since
> the code itself is still free. They just want to make sure, that a
> product wearing t
Hello Bastian,
* Bastian Venthur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-10-03 22:29]:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I do hope that debian can overcome the recent of firefox. It is nice for
> > them
> > to show their true colors.
> >
> > That being said I hope that debian can muster enough support to fork fi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I do hope that debian can overcome the recent of firefox. It is nice for them
> to show their true colors.
>
> That being said I hope that debian can muster enough support to fork firefox
> into a new browser. One in which is truly free & and embraces opensource.
Not su
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:46:45AM -0700, Chris Waters wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 01:27:01PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>
> > I would like to propose a name: Debian WaterBuffalo
>
> I thought we already agreed on "IceWeasel". :)
>
There was some discussion about potential Firefox re
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 01:27:01PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> I would like to propose a name: Debian WaterBuffalo
I thought we already agreed on "IceWeasel". :)
--
Chris Waters | Pneumonoultra-osis is too long
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | microscopicsilico-to fit i
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 09:34:30PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I do hope that debian can overcome the recent of firefox. It is nice for them
> to show their true colors.
>
> That being said I hope that debian can muster enough support to fork firefox
> into a new browser. One in which is tru
I do hope that debian can overcome the recent of firefox. It is nice for them
to show their true colors.
That being said I hope that debian can muster enough support to fork firefox
into a new browser. One in which is truly free & and embraces opensource.
A few of us our starting a foundation of
11 matches
Mail list logo
