On 04/16/12 01:01, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi Jose,
Jose Luis Rivas wrote:
On 04/11/2012 09:37 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Hi,
> in February, Stefano Zacchiroli added a document titled "Debian
Position on
[...]
> 5. A request/demand that people concerned with specific patent
issues do no
Hi Jose,
Jose Luis Rivas wrote:
On 04/11/2012 09:37 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Hi,
> in February, Stefano Zacchiroli added a document titled "Debian
Position on
[...]
> 5. A request/demand that people concerned with specific patent
issues do not
> share their concerns, except with t
Hi MJ,
MJ Ray wrote:
[...]
Also, can the DPL really not just issue this position statement
as a "decision for whom noone else has responsibility"? I'm
pretty sure the DPL procedure (such as it is) was followed: that
zack solicited views and made a decision he felt to be consistent
with the c
On 04/11/2012 09:37 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Hi,
> in February, Stefano Zacchiroli added a document titled "Debian Position on
[...]
> 5. A request/demand that people concerned with specific patent issues do not
> share their concerns, except with the contact point mentioned in 3.
>
>
On 04/12/12 20:53, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 19:59 +0530, dE . wrote:
On 04/12/12 19:53, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 12 avril 2012 à 19:07 +0530, dE . a écrit :
[...]
As a result I suggest, restricting the download and hosting of such
software in the US.. since software
On Thu, 2012-04-12 at 19:59 +0530, dE . wrote:
> On 04/12/12 19:53, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > Le jeudi 12 avril 2012 à 19:07 +0530, dE . a écrit :
[...]
> >> As a result I suggest, restricting the download and hosting of such
> >> software in the US.. since software patents practically only apply
On 04/12/12 19:53, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le jeudi 12 avril 2012 à 19:07 +0530, dE . a écrit :
I'm very much unhappy with the policies put down here, looking at the
amount of patents Microsoft is holding, it making developing any
software a challenge; that results in the Debian repos being
--em
Le jeudi 12 avril 2012 à 19:07 +0530, dE . a écrit :
> I'm very much unhappy with the policies put down here, looking at the
> amount of patents Microsoft is holding, it making developing any
> software a challenge; that results in the Debian repos being
> --emtpy--.
For the - at least - 15th time
On 04/12/12 07:37, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Hi,
in February, Stefano Zacchiroli added a document titled "Debian
Position on Software Patents" to our website:
http://www.debian.org/legal/patent
This document includes both a position and a policy regarding software
patents. It st
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> 5. A request/demand that people concerned with specific patent issues
> do not share their concerns, except with the contact point mentioned
> in 3.
>
> [...] 5. is, however, anti-transparency, and IMO against
> our ethics. Such a position statement cannot be ma
Hi,
in February, Stefano Zacchiroli added a document titled "Debian Position
on Software Patents" to our website: http://www.debian.org/legal/patent
This document includes both a position and a policy regarding software
patents. It states:
1.
Debian will not knowingly
Filipus Klutiero
> Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > Debian Position on Software Patents
> Thanks. But where was this "position"/policy discussed?
I think it was mainly discussed between DPL and lawyers, and DPL and
interested developers who contacted him. There were s
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
The Debian Projecthttp://www.debian.org/
Debian Position on Software Patents pr...@lists.debian.org
February 19th, 2012http://www.debian.org/News/2012/20120219
13 matches
Mail list logo
