Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It's the shortage of "based on" that's the problem.
> "Assemble a 100 percent Debian core..."
> No, Debian does that. What do they mean?
If they take a subset of debian as their core, it would be 100
percent debian.
> | The DCC is not a Linux distributio
Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Nov 2005, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> their FAQ still contains an enormous amount of misuse of the Debian
>> name, as noted in a message I sent on a different thread (and cc:ed
>> to them). I think this can all be fixed if they just rewrite it.
>
> Use of the trad
On Tue, 01 Nov 2005, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> their FAQ still contains an enormous amount of misuse of the Debian
> name, as noted in a message I sent on a different thread (and cc:ed
> to them). I think this can all be fixed if they just rewrite it.
Use of the trademark in a purely descriptive f
Don Armstrong wrote:
> Just to clarify what the current status of my delegation to resolve
> the trademark issues surrounding the DCCA:
>
> The DCCA/DCC has changed their name to be a recursive acronym, thereby
> removing any mention of Debian's mark in their name, and resolving the
> primary tra
Just to clarify what the current status of my delegation to resolve
the trademark issues surrounding the DCCA:
The DCCA/DCC has changed their name to be a recursive acronym, thereby
removing any mention of Debian's mark in their name, and resolving the
primary trademark issue that I was delegated
5 matches
Mail list logo
