On Thu, 25 Jun 2009, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:13:55PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > 1. There is precisely one mail (ITP bug from November) from 2007 in
> >the lists.d.o archive and he was advocated in January 2008.
>
> I think it would be nice to have [...] replies
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:13:55PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> 1. There is precisely one mail (ITP bug from November) from 2007 in
>the lists.d.o archive and he was advocated in January 2008.
I think it would be nice to have svn.d.o/git.d.o commits and replies to
bug reports available as w
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 07:27:57PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
The problem with Debian's processes is not that they are too slow,
but that they are full of people who only degrade Debian.
I agree with the concern. But the reason is twofold. On one hand we
might hav
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 07:27:57PM +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> The problem with Debian's processes is not that they are too slow,
> but that they are full of people who only degrade Debian.
I agree with the concern. But the reason is twofold. On one hand we
might have lost our ability to selec
Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
I'd be perfectly fine with FD being the last review step, and DAM
"just" in charge of creating the account, trusting FD judgement.
What would we be missing that way?
What you miss is that I move all problematic candidates to DAM with the comment
5 matches
Mail list logo
