On 09/01/19 17:03, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Please search your communications archives.
I notice Norbert is somebody who goes beyond the core responsibilities
of maintaining packages, thinks about challenging social issues that
affect our community and looks for ways to communicate about them.
Mistak
Hi Ian
On Thu, 10 Jan 2019, 02:03 Ian Jackson Very regrettably, it may become necessary to produce a fuller list of
> incidents, including responses, to justify the recent DAM decision.
>
> Please search your communications archives. If you have had an
> adverse experience of any kind with Norbe
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:03:14PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Very regrettably, it may become necessary to produce a fuller list of
> incidents, including responses, to justify the recent DAM decision.
>
> Please search your communications archives. If you have had an
> adverse experience of any
On 15277 March 1977, Ian Jackson wrote:
Very regrettably, it may become necessary to produce a fuller list of
incidents, including responses, to justify the recent DAM decision.
Please search your communications archives. If you have had an
adverse experience of any kind with Norbert Preining, i
On 2019-01-09 17:03 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Please search your communications archives. If you have had an
> adverse experience of any kind with Norbert Preining, in public or in
> private, please email me.
What about if we have only had positive experience/communications? Can
we not submit
Outsider here. Conflict around Norbert's mode of discourse and Ian's
mode of responding to it has clearly been an ongoing problem for
Debian for over five years: https://lwn.net/Articles/575390/ What
tools for resolving this exist now that didn't exist then? If the
answer is "nothing much", the
Thomas Lange - 09.01.19, 18:17:
> > This reminded me about
> > https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2018/12/msg00025.html
>
> For easier understanding, this is the post from Daniel with subject:
>
> "€ 500 cash bounty for information / Debian privacy breaches"
Thanks for looking it up.
I do
> This reminded me about
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2018/12/msg00025.html
For easier understanding, this is the post from Daniel with subject:
"€ 500 cash bounty for information / Debian privacy breaches"
--
regards Thomas
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:03:14PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Very regrettably, it may become necessary to produce a fuller list of
> incidents, including responses, to justify the recent DAM decision.
>
Ian,
How can you consider post hoc evidence gathering and justification to be
ethical?
Rega
On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 05:03:14PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Very regrettably, it may become necessary to produce a fuller list of
> incidents, including responses, to justify the recent DAM decision.
Sorry, but such things should be collected before a decision, not after.
"Please help us justify
experiences of Norbert Preining' as your Subject
line.
I will summarise and collate these reports. I will *only* share this
information if there is a Debian GR which would have the effect of
reinstating Norbert. If there is such a GR, I will share the
collation publicly.
(If the Constit
11 matches
Mail list logo
