Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Please consider http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?BehavioralEffectOfMetrics.
> >
> > Especially following section:
> >
> > | As JimCoplien has been saying for years (repeating an old adage),
> > | "What gets measured gets done." Measure the Severity A bug rep
Jordi Mallach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 12:24:48AM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > > Well, if with "touching" you mean NMU'ing right away to score a point, I
> > > wouldn't call it "possitive".
> > That's why new bugs are assigned only once a month, though. Players
Thomas Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was refered to debian because of the availability of Digital Alpha
> releases. I noticed at Redhat that there are separate releases for the
> different alpha processors. From what I've seen here, am I to assume the
> Debian release for alpha is a on
> " " == Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 1. Raising the NM entry requirement in order to improve
>> Debian's quality. Which is a very good thing.
The quality of Debian is hard to measure.
Does a single package in unstable by a single maintainer have any
effect on debian?
Matthew Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Care should be taken to choose maintainers that recieve their fax on
> > the computer, so it can be used directly without another quality loss
> > by scanning.
>
> This means that people without FAX machines can't be
Seth Cohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [btw, is there a better list than curiosa to send this too? The archive
> for curiosa is almost empty, so I decided a cc: to project wasn't out of
> line, if only to remind people about the curiosa list...)
subscribe...subscribe...subscribe...subscribe.
D
Theres been a long discussion about the passport stuff, but if I
remember the old notes on hot to become a maintainer right there was
allways the option to send a copy of the passport via good old mail.
And don't tell me you have no copy maschine near you.
Or what about faxing it to a maintainer
> " " == truename <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [snip]
>> I too would be forced to use another dist if the non-free
>> software was no longer maintained by debian.
> this is wrong. Redhat only have ONE cd as their well-organized
> distro, other packages are added by o
> " " == Christian Surchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2000 at 06:30:10PM +0200, David N. Welton
> wrote:
...
> Maybe popularity-contest could help us. We know that pine and
> netscape are very important. Mozilla exists, but what about
> pine? It
> " " == Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, implementing the infrastructure for this proposal would
> take us 9/10 of the way to implementing package pools (and, in
> any event, the pools from what I've heard are just waiting on
> potato to release so we don
I want to ask anyone willing to delete non-free:
WHAT IS FREE?
A lot of stuff in non-free is FREE for most people. Think about
gif. Most of the world doesn`t care about the patent. Many Packages in
non-free are nearly free, but for some reason not everywhere or for
everyone.
Debian without non-f
Could you interact with the popularity-contest package to consider the
useage of a apckage for its stableness.
The reason is that if nobody updates to a new version, then no bugs
will be filled, even if its completly broken.
May the Source be withz you.
Goswin
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin Brederlow writes:
> > I don´t like the
> > alphabetic sorting. Its hard to find something you don´t know the
> > exact name of.
>
> Hm... often "ls */*pattern*" in lftp was needed and sufficient for m
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin Brederlow writes:
> > Of cause main guis should be mentioned, but something like gnome woult
> > be x11/gnome and the first two level would be exactly spezified and
> > relevant. But the third level specifying wh
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin Brederlow writes:
> > > > Interface: tty (stdio, dialog), X11 (Xt, Qt)
> > >
> > > Problem I see: we can't sub-classify Xaw and Motif from Xt with such a
> > > syntax.
> >
> &
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Goswin Brederlow writes:
> > Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ...
> > > tty
> > > tty/stdio
> > > tty/curses
> > > tty/dialog
> > > tty/newt
> > &g
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> tty
> tty/stdio
> tty/curses
> tty/dialog
> tty/newt
>
> X11
> X11/Xt
> X11/Xt/Xaw
> X11/Xt/Motif
> X11/Gtk+
> X11/Gtk+/GNOME
> X11/Qt
> X11/Qt/KDE
> X11/Tk
I wuld suggest to use a syntax like this in the Packages file:
Interface: tty (stdio, dialog)
Edward Brocklesby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [1 ]
> Hi,
>
> The attached document details a modification written by Zephaniah E. Hull
> and I, which I am proposing as an amendment to the Debian Constitution.
> This hopefully solves one or two problems we have identified in Debian,
> namely cl
Isn´t base everything thats on the base.tgz file?
I allways thought so.
While your at killing the base section, kill the other sections
also. Its all a bloody mess. Graphics stuff is in libs, x11 stuff in
games, some dev packages are in dev, some in lib some somewhere else.
Just some examples: Wh
"Christopher W. Curtis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello,
...
> adding another level might allow this to work better. Instead of
> the seemingly three-tiered design, I would like to suggest a
> four-tier:
>
> stable (release)
> frozen
> semistable
> unstable
Sounds good. Stable should be wha
Fabien Ninoles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 09:43:57PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > Philippe Troin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > 1) The way the Debian archive works requires the data to be stored
> > >
Anthony Towns writes:
> [1 ]
> On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 11:00:14PM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 09:43:57PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > > Why not allow Source only packages ?
> > That will win nothing. You can't use apt-get o
Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 19, 1999 at 09:43:57PM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
>
> > Why not allow Source only packages ?
>
> That will win nothing. You can't use apt-get on them, have to rebuilt
> and have them twice locall
Philippe Troin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) The way the Debian archive works requires the data to be stored
> twice (source package and .deb).
Why not allow Source only packages ?
May the Source be with you.
Goswin
24 matches
Mail list logo
