-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2020-06-12 at 17:12 -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> On 6/10/2020 2:59 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> - Audio is a constant headache (instead of earache).
> - Graphics is frequently fun. Nvidia cards definitely add a challenge
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Wed, 2020-06-10 at 08:43 -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> Hi Yves-Alexis
>
> > What can be done in the Debian community to help you do that *before*
> > the hardware are in the hand of volunteers, because as you already
> > said that means the laptop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 11:58 -0400, Mark Pearson wrote:
> That's where doing a Debian pre-load would be challenging (which is
> really where this conversation started). If support for a platform isn't
> there until 6 to 8 months after it's shipped (
On Mon, 2017-10-16 at 21:06 +0200, Christian Seiler wrote:
> Unfortunately, as far as I understand it, there's no easy method for
> detecting these kinds of broken keys without actually attempting to
> factorize them - and while that's feasible (hence the vulnerability)
> it is still quite expensiv
On ven., 2016-02-12 at 09:21 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> https://www.lsc-group.phys.uwm.edu/lscdatagrid/doc/reference-platform.html
>
> The Ganglia graph (top right corner of the page) appears to be generated
> on a Debian host using the official packages (it has ganglia-webfrontend
> in the URL
On mar., 2015-03-17 at 09:42 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:29 AM, Dark Serph wrote:
>
> > Please, think fondly in updating the xfce packages on JESSIE, before
> > launching it!
>
> Your suggestion would probably have best been sent to the maintainers
> of the Xfce packages i
On lun., 2015-01-19 at 09:13 -0500, The Wanderer wrote:
> The solution here would be either to convince upstreams not to depend on
> policykit, or to provide (restore?) and package a sufficiently
> functional implementation of policykit which does not depend on
> libpam-systemd.
Some people are tr
On ven., 2014-08-08 at 18:38 -0700, Paul C. Bryan wrote:
> With all due respect to XFCE, I'd hate the interpretation to be along
> the lines of, "Oh, Debian state of the art desktop environment feels
> something like Windows, circa 2000." But, XFCE's lightweight. It's
> meant
> to lack such fancy f
On jeu., 2014-08-07 at 23:57 +0200, Jordi Mallach wrote:
> Hi Debian,
About the decision itself, as Debian Xfce main maintainer, I honestly
don't really care. I don't think the default desktop matters that much
on Debian (while I guess it means a lot for Ubuntu, for example). I
actually think havi
of them were used for uploads since the beginning of 2013.
It doesn't really change anything, does it? Sure, uploads are not the
only way to check someone is active, but still, people with no upload
since 2012 and a 1024{D,R} key is likely a candidate for direct contact.
--
Yves-Alexis Pere
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:08:43AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2014-02-27, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> > Well, a quick grep on the result shows that of those 652 uploads done
> > using 1024b keys, only half of them were made since the beginning of
> > 2013. 327 have been
o directly have a 4096R
one, but eh). That won't actually stop me worrying for the rest of the
Debian keyring, because only one compromised key is enough, and
cryptography is really a field where you prefer to be safe than sorry.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ithm issue, which could lead to signature
collision attacks (wether in data signing or in key signing).
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
k grep on the result shows that of those 652 uploads done
using 1024b keys, only half of them were made since the beginning of
2013. 327 have been done *before* 2013. I guess those can't really be
treated as “active” and are candidate for emeritus or disable after a
wat run.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
giant thread like
the ones that made me unsubscribe from debian-devel@.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sat, 2013-10-26 at 20:24 +, Bart Martens wrote:
> Cover up ? I did suggest approaches with full transparency among DDs.
I don't think that's the meaning of “public” Steve (And Lars) initially
thought about…
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed me
On ven., 2012-12-07 at 22:01 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 13053 March 1977, Arno Töll wrote:
> >> Thanks for securing it quickly :) Is there any danger of the vulnerable
> >> code being in use on other systems, e.g. as part of a dak install?
> > Indeed, thanks for fixing the issue so fast.
>
>
On ven., 2012-08-10 at 14:01 +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> some binary software forced me into downloading a RedHat flavour, so I
> went for Fedora. I found it very easy to get an ISO. I mean - very very
> very easy. My suggestion is to copy that for our now pending release or
> to make it even ea
On sam., 2012-03-31 at 15:54 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> That
> way, US Debian Developers could ignore the whole export control issue
> because they were uploading it to a host still in the US and the project
> handled the notification automatically on their behalf when the packages
> went to our
On mar., 2012-03-27 at 15:56 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> The second option (i.e. the 50% cut) is *not* currently on the table,
> simply because DDG is not the default search engine in web browsers
> shipped by Debian at present. What I'm proposing is to accept the 25%
> cut that will origina
On mar., 2012-03-20 at 01:23 +, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> Comrades!
>
> We just finished a very productive Debian System Administration team
> sprint in Oslo, Norway.
First, thanks for the amazing job you do.
> Hosting & Virtualization
>
> Virtualization has come of a
On lun., 2011-05-09 at 16:21 -0400, Guzzi, Greg (GE Aviation, US) wrote:
> To obtain a ECCN for Debian 5.0 will I need to request this from BIS?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=debian+eccn returns
http://wiki.debian.org/USExportControl as first answer.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: T
On mar., 2011-01-11 at 15:58 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote:
> (with my ANSSI hat on)
>
> On mar., 2011-01-11 at 10:32 +0100, Treuil, Malvina (GE Healthcare,
> consultant) wrote:
> > Dear Madam, Dear Sir, The company I work for GEHC buys the software
> > containing the f
hould be available soon, I'll keep you posted.
Regards,
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
ANSSI/ACE/LAM
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On sam., 2010-08-28 at 11:50 +0200, emanuele carrea wrote:
> Here it is
>
> http://www.zazzle.com/great_pacific_garbage_patch_sticker-217837941260564597
>
> didn't know where to write it, but I think it's worth saying it.
Note that it's the swirl without Debian which is the “openuse” logo. See
On 12/08/2010 14:59, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> - Instead of writing such files (and keeping them updated), we should put more
> energy into doing this task automatically. There are various tools to analyze
> licenses automatically, for example from OpenLogic (commercial unfortunately)
> or
> http://f
On 25/06/2010 10:52, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> As usual in Debian - which is a community effort mostly - you can get a
> release
> quicker or longer security support for a release, if you pay somebody to do
> so.
> There are several companies and consultants who employ/are Debian developers
> and
>
On mar., 2010-06-01 at 23:27 +0530, V.Krishn wrote:
> >>DVD 4 and 5 might be possible to club in on.
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >The packages on the CD and DVD sets are currently organised
> >automatically to optimise the layout in terms of dependencies and
> >popularity. That can be reasonably easily worked
On jeu., 2010-05-06 at 21:16 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > If there really was a need for it, such images would already exist.
>
> They do already exist and are labelled "*Ubuntu."
>
> That's what people end up trying and installing after they waste their time
> in
On 06/05/2010 11:59, Tapio Lehtonen wrote:
> How does the user know, which firmware he/she is going to need? It is doable
> to
> have the files on usb-stick or some such, if it is known which files need to
> be
> there.
Note that firwmare.tar.gz contains quite a lot of firmwares. And, afair,
the
On jeu., 2010-05-06 at 03:17 -0300, Jorge Gonçalves wrote:
> First, thank you for the great distro that is Debian, one of the best.
>
> I would like to suggest you some way so that the users keep on using
> the good old KDE 3.5 when they migrate to the upcoming Lenny.
>
> Maybe use dummy packages
On jeu., 2010-05-06 at 09:15 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> I recently had to install Debian lenny on a HP ProLiant machine, which
> required bnx2 firmware for the network controller. Just downloaded the
> firmware .deb from packages.d.o, stuck it on a FAT32 formatted USB
> stick and everything worked f
On sam., 2009-10-24 at 18:36 +0200, Frank Lin PIAT wrote:
> I believe that confusion isn't good for any of the projects.
> What do you think about?.
I don't really think anybody would confuse CentOS and Debian because of
that theme.
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digital
On ven, 2009-05-15 at 10:15 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Upload the .changes again, the rest of the files are still there. This
> time it should actually work. :)
Worked fine, thanks.
Cheers,
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
.changes has bad PGP/GnuPG signature!
> Removing /epdfview_0.1.7-2_amd64.changes, but keeping its associated files
> for now.
cor...@hidalgo: gpg --verify epdfview_0.1.7-2_amd64.changes
gpg: Signature made ven 15 mai 2009 08:32:06 CEST using DSA key ID C5C05BAE
gpg: Good signature from "Yves-Al
On mer, 2009-04-08 at 11:11 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> I think it would be nice to have because
> - the !debian group on identi.ca is IMO pretty useless since
> everybody who turns on their computer and knows how to spell
> d-e-b-i-a-n seems to !need !to !tell !the !world !about !it
>
On lun, 2009-02-16 at 12:02 +, Thomas Nguyen Van wrote:
> My questions are:
> 1. Do you confirm the amount of new security updates? If yes, what is the
> link?
> 2. Did you change the public key available for security updates?
http://www.debian.org/News/2009/20090214
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To
On dim, 2009-02-15 at 17:33 +, James Bromberger wrote:
> Perhaps we could
> encourage people unable to physically attend to still watch and be on
> IRC for Q&A?
I know that last year (or the year before) people in the Debian devroom
used gobby to comment and add stuff about the talk. With live
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 12:30:02PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> The Debian Contributor class is a class of people that can't do anything.
Sure, it really sounds good…
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECT
On mar, 2008-04-15 at 20:48 +0300, Mario Spinthiras wrote:
> Debian on the desktop? It's called Ubuntu!
plonk.
--
Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On lun, 2008-04-14 at 21:44 -0700, Will Kaiser wrote:
> Yeah, I had actually already looked into the Debian Live CD project.
> Unfortunately there is no product available for download at this time
> that I can line up with my images for comparison. So, we really have
> no idea what's included on th
On lun, 2008-02-25 at 23:53 +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Many countries still sometimes have
> heads of state and government from opposing political views (French
> "cohabitation") and it puts the brakes on the more radical reforms,
> but the fifth republic (for example) hasn't fallen yet.
President and
On jeu, 2007-05-31 at 17:19 +0100, Matthew Johnson wrote:
> How about improving the NM application process so that people don't
> have
> to spend 4 months waiting for an AM[1,2,3,4], or to have their
> accounts
> created [5,6,7,8], or to be approved by FD[6,7].
Is it really in "the NM application
On lun, 2007-05-28 at 22:37 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> that the first seasons of
> simpsons were created on a proprietary operating system (irix) with
> proprietary software.
And what does the common knowledge says about the OS used to create toy
story characters?
--
Yves-Alexis
--
To UNS
On jeu, 2007-03-15 at 01:41 -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> If person X is a DD and maintaining 2 packages and has never sponsored
> anything, then (I dont like 'demoting' as it is an insult to their
> contribution) they would not notice a change in their status if it
> still allows them to contribute i
On mer, 2007-03-14 at 20:50 +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> My first thought: do we really need this new class of contributors? I
> mean how many people do you currently know fitting in this category
> (don't like to become DD just maintainers). I guess there will be
> some,
> but I think the amoun
On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 14:58 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Most Jabber servers...
topic is -irc-.debian.org, iirc
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
out moving *irc*.debian.org from
an irc network to another. If you don't want to use irc, nobody forces
you. But why posting here a mail that has nothing to do with the initial
message ?
--
Yves-Alexis Perez
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
48 matches
Mail list logo
