On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 07:20:37PM -0700, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 05:07:14PM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
> > I'm not sure I'm interpreting you correctly. Are you suggesting
> > that I suspend this proposal until a more definitive position
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 06:54:55PM -0400, Eric Sharkey wrote:
> > Well, that's a simplification. But Debian can modify the logo
> > to refer to something else, say goldfish, while other people cannot. So
> > the playing field isn't open, so it isn't DFSG-free.
>
> You are completely misrepre
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 05:48:42PM -0400, Eric Sharkey wrote:
> > [ You e-mailed me privately, so I'll keep it that way. But I'll remove
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] to keep Manoj's INBOX smaller. ]
>
> You can quote/forward me anywhere if you like. devel-announce is supposed
> to be very low traffic
M-F-T set to debian-project.
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 06:23:40PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 05:35:14PM -0400, Simon Law wrote:
> > The old Open Use logo was not DFSG-free, so we really shouldn't be
> > shipping it in main.
>
> Where are we shippi
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 01:25:18PM -0700, Benj. Mako Hill wrote:
> Since there are already people working on this, I think that the most
> constructive thing will be to follow up on the DPL's announcement in
> regards to the trademark committee and to get involved in the efforts
> already underway.
On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 10:39:29AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> The karma.pl script blindly follows ... where the maintainer itself leads.
> It just picks the info off the Debian BTS and package db (I've forgotten the
> details as I wrote this a long time ago). See the code itself -- Kitame mu
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 01:14:52PM +0100, Jonathan Amery wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> > First, please do not say "piracy" since that does not convey the
> >proper meaning. Due to historical artifacts, what you really mean is
> >"copyright infringement" and not "looting
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 10:11:50PM -0400, Phil Beder wrote:
> 3. Someone raise the point that recently, users of open source /
> Free Software have the reputation of being software pirates, and that
> this sort of open exchange at public meetings might look bad or be
> counter productive to the
8 matches
Mail list logo
