On 5/31/2019 11:04 PM, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> Before you ask: an insecure hypervisor is an insecure buildd.
Are we then looking more closely at AMD-based machines given that those
had less problems around speculative attacks?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
the middle of week
39, October 1st at the latest.
base-files can be uploaded now, as it will be held in NEW until closing
time anyway.
Kind regards and thanks for your efforts
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ould mainly be marketing for those sysadmins who try to
"sell" Debian as the best since sliced bread for routers and firewalls[1].
;-) And if something's missing and subsequently added it would be helpful
for others, too.
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
[1] Maybe less for routers but mo
[assignee: faw]
- upgrade-reports to be prepared and solicited [assignee: vorlon]
5) Any other business?
- This item was not called as the time budget was exceeded.
A full log is available on [1] (text-only version on [2]). Action and info
items are also available as extracted bits on [3
d a hard one of 1,5h.
Later items on the list might be postponed to a later meeting.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
on behalf of the Debian Release Team
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
s own dak instance and which I'd like to move to=20
> ftp-master.d.o)
The latter also being the plan for volatile. It's just that there's no
progress towards that goal for quite some time.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ..
conclude from my own expiriences
from webwml it's mostly a fear to overload/disappoint translators that blocks
huge updates from happening.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On 2009-08-24, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:22:28 +, Philipp Kern wrote:
>>> I wonder if it was always the case that when you switch to upstart you
>>> get to say 'Yes, I know I'll break my system, dpkg, pl
27;t care very much of
> Petter's work and that you prefer staying with the old system instead of
> fixing the new system to suit your needs, and that's backwards.
We do care and he told you. I find it very sad that you're bashing the
messenger now.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
On 2009-08-11, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>>> No lp please! here is debian, we got alioth -> use it.
>> Please don't tell me what to do with *my code* should I ever retrieve it.
> it's not your code.
> I filed the bug, so I have a bit of responsibility to hand it to capable
> people.
> Luckily other guys
spend the time on other issues.
(Of course the DSA process might need some helper scripts and a reliable
buildd infrastructure to consume less.)
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
cript of another package in your postinst maintainer script.
Been there, don't that.
And no, it's not the missing byte-compilation that triggers the failure but the
missing symlink farm that's usually processed by a trigger at the end of the
installation run.
Kind regards,
Philipp
't know if Debconf changed something
in this regard.
Anyway I don't know how responsive he is wrt emails. I can understand that
the hostility on d-python didn't help in that regard, but maybe To'ing or
Cc'ing him on some mails might help.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To
the problem is almost every time. But I guess we'll get there
as soon as we have debug packages in place.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
g
a bit of unstable helps us to apply some peer pressure. Kudos to all of
them who helped releasing in the last freezing cycle. I just don't like
the perspective of feeling alone in the next one.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debi
e honest. I rarely see Fedoras.
Maybe my sample set is biased, though.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
ny statement
> about actively providing support to debian to make this "experiment"
> something where we are both winning or not?
Never ever! Nevermind teams like clamav that try it. *sigh*
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Of course it applies to universe where Ubuntu is heavily relying
on Debian to do the work.
But it's only main that's officially supported (even security-wise) anyway.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
reezes with no coordination? Been there, done that, thank you.
Well, or not fixing RC bugs during the freeze at all but complaining that
the freeze is taking so long and "hurts" unstable.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debi
are diverging opinions if registry initialisation
data provided in array form is something non-free that needs to be stripped
from the kernel.
Those people are also vocal outside the lists to market their impression that
Debian is not all free despite our best efforts to keep it that way.
Kind regard
iteable. The others are all,
|of course, locally world-readable but only 'install' and 'byhand'
|are publicly visible on http://incoming.debian.org/
And I can't find anything in Anthony's mail to contradict this.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRI
[ Forwarded on behalf of Sven Luther ]
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 09:31:40AM +, Philipp Kern wrote:
>
> On 2009-05-13, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > ,
> >|5. Works that do not meet our free software standards
> >|
> >| We acknowledge that some o
ave come up with is called "contrib" and
> "non-free" areas in our archive.
> Isn't that perfectly clear?
Sure, but why the heck was the discussion if we should delay the release
instead of moving the kernel to non-free because it's tainted with few
bin
rs, both of which involve fixing bugs.
> But section one doesn't just say it's a goal, or a priority, but says
> that it is actually a *promise* not just to try hard, but *never* to
> release non-free software as part of Debian.
Actually, going by the word of the Social Contract,
hats? I mean we all have our immaginary hats to put on when
facing different situations. Like this we could move this into reality. :D
Ciao && SCNR,
Philipp Kern
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Allombert wrote:
Given that MJ Ray has taken the trouble to check the list for sites that
are still active, I think you are hitting the wrong nail[1] with the wrong
hammer[2].
Actually it is hammerhead[1], as suggested by p.d.o's non-exact search.
SCNR.
Kind regards,
Philipp Ker
Taha Nazari wrote:
what is the release date of the stable version of Debian Srage 3.1
Please refer to [1], it will be updated if anything changes. Currently
May 30, 2005 is the planned release date.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
[1] http://www.nl.debian.org/releases/sarge/
--
To
27 matches
Mail list logo
