Hi,
On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 07:01:37PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 01:59:18PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > Comments? Volunteers?
>
> Thanks to Shapado developers (and in particular Patrick Aljord) and to
> Fernando C. Estrada and Luis Uribe (current admins),
Hi Steffen,
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 12:10:57PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> > Ehm, yeah, and my father is the emperor of china, then.
> > As you know, in Debian we have to deal at least with:
> >
> > - uncorporative upstreams
> > - dead upstreams
> > - corporative upstreams
> >
> which would
Hi Steffen,
I assume nothing in your mail is adressing me privately
so I'm quoting it in my reply to the mailing list.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:18:39PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 05:24 PM, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:02:43PM +0200,
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 05:02:43PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> "flattr" or otherwise support that package. The amount collected should
> then go to upstream. Maybe we should not do this for all packages but
> only when upstream asks for it.
I guess we as a project will already run into dis
Hi Felipe,
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 11:51:21AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> On 06/07/10 10:09, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
>
>
> AFAICT, none of this justifies silently removing someone from the NM
> database.
yes, you are probably right. But OTOH if a candidate fails the basic
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 06, 2010 at 03:13:34PM +0200, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote:
> I, as an outsider, don't want to "investigate and report" on people, in
> general; I'm just concerned with packages being in a good shape (especially
> the ones that I know of, and if I can help in any way).
we
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:07:04AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> I have been recently wondering [2] why that feed is not on Planet. Ana
> would be glad to be there, but she has the impression that Planet policy
> forbids non-individual feds to be there. I've been checking the current
> gu
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 11:17:01AM +0100, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 08:57:50AM +0200, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> > Of course it would be nicer if patches were reported automatically to us.
>
> This is by no means a universally held view within Debia
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 08:04:12AM +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
> Yes, but OTOH we strongly support copyleft softwares versus the BSD-
> like softwares, because we expect to have back the works and
> because we expect to behave as a big community.
>
> I agree with you, it is not thiefs,
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 09:34:39PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 06:40:06PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> >> THEY STEAL our packages
> >
> > Uarg. That sentence let me discard everything sensible/intelligent
> > you might have said in your mail. I often read sentences like tha
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 03, 2009 at 06:40:06PM +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> THEY STEAL our packages
Uarg. That sentence let me discard everything sensible/intelligent
you might have said in your mail. I often read sentences like that
in the discussion. It makes me sick and wonder if I do invest my time in
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 01:07:39PM +, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I'm not aware of any apples-to-apples comparisons of Debian's and Ubuntu's
> "quality"; but personally I haven't seen much evidence that Debian's
> is significantly superior (NB: I haven't used Ubuntu LTS personally,
> though). T
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 04:51:22PM +0200, Ana Guerrero wrote:
> Agnieszka Czajkowska has presented this morning at DebConf a very nice
> redesign proposal off the Debian logo and the Debian website. She has been
> working on this all the last year as part of her master thesis in Design.
>
> You c
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:56:00PM +0200, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:52:20AM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>
> > My opinion in two short comments:
>
> > - reduce the time to 1 year
>
> This introduces the possibility that, even if the DD votes in every election
> and u
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 11:11:39PM -0800, Evan Larson wrote:
> I am not using your OS but I am encountering a strange bug on my computer that
> says I am. When I try to navigate to en.wikipedia.org
this page is shown when people install lighttpd and don't configure it.
Its on the webserver yo
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 01:35:43PM +0200, cobaco wrote:
> AIUI he's just advocating having the equivalent of a (publicly scrutinized)
> NMU for the keyring, that is:
> - have trusted gatekeeper(s) who normally does all changes
> - have all changes be public (many eyes make all bugs shallow)
>
Hi,
Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> * Membership is controlled via GnuPG keyrings, primarily maintained by the
> Debian Account Manager. The keyrings shall be maintained in a way that
> allows any member to change them, and that is fully transparent to the
> members in general, and that further make
17 matches
Mail list logo
