Re: Replace the TC power to depose maintainers

2016-12-05 Thread Matthew Woodcraft
On 2016-12-05 20:57, Philip Hands wrote: > Tollef Fog Heen writes: >> ]] Ian Jackson >>> That is 6+ weeks' more stop-energy. 6+ weeks' more inaction. 6+ >>> weeks during which members of the TC have been prevaricating. >> What are you accusing the TC of lying about? > I think that British En

Re: What do you win by moving things to non-free?

2005-04-18 Thread Matthew Woodcraft
Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > >* The Invariant Section is retained, but another Invariant Section > > > containing a rebuttal is added to the document. This would a) look > > > silly, and b) be a beginning of Invariant Section bloat, in which a > > > document could consist of 10% Invariant Sections

Re: What do you win by moving things to non-free?

2005-04-16 Thread Matthew Woodcraft
Wouter Verhelst wrote: >A more realistic example would be > >Answer: Because the document contains an invariant section on the > author's opinion regarding the dangers of Software Patents in > the European Union. > >Something like that simply is not free. It might be true at the time th