Re: Current delay to registration (Re: RFC: Changing the NM system)

2000-12-30 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
r of the process is _not_ affected the time of initial application or time of AM approval (from the last 3-4 months at least - according to information on http://nm.debian.org/nmlist.php). -- Mariusz Przygodzki| Good judgement comes from experience. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Exper

Re: RFC: Changing the NM system

2000-12-29 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
re 40 guys who are waiting for the DAM approval more than 30 days. Of, course these are only statistics. -- Mariusz Przygodzki| Good judgement comes from experience. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Experience comes from bad judgement. http://www.dune.home.pl | GPG KeyID: 0x42FAD77

Re: RFC: Changing the NM system

2000-12-28 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
) Don't worry. The current NM process is (almost) on hold. -- Mariusz Przygodzki| Good judgement comes from experience. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Experience comes from bad judgement. http://www.dune.home.pl | GPG KeyID: 0x42FAD771 GPG Fingerprint: 1990 F07B FFB4 BE0B FF26 10C2 BE2B 965C 42FA D771

Re: RFC: Changing the NM system

2000-12-17 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
n case of the DAM's dissatisfaction *or* the DAM decide to make a new account quickly without a confirmation of sufficient applicant's skills from other maintaners. So there's a difference between a personal subjective decision and a decision wich is taken by a group of people, esp

Re: RFC: Changing the NM system

2000-12-17 Thread Mariusz Przygodzki
like the major part of official maintaners. > This doesn't require an account and a direct way of uploading packages. This doesn't require an account but the problem mentioned by Colin Watson is still real then. -- Mariusz Przygodzki| Good judgement comes from experi