Debian Project Leader Election 2024 Results

| |--+--++---++-++---| Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Debian Project Leader Election 2023 Results

|455 | 89 | 44.695 | 9.50706 | | 2022 | 1023 | 47.976 | 363 |354 | 73 | 34.604 | 7.37860 | | 2023 | 996 | 47.339 | 283 |279 | 71 | 28.012 | 5.89363 | |--+--++---++-++---| Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary

General Resolution: non-free firmware: results

Hi, The results of the General Resolution about non-free firmware: Option 5 "Change SC for non-free firmware in installer, one installer" The details of the results are available at: https://www.debian.org/vote/2022/vote_003 Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc D

Debian Project Leader Election 2022 Results

|455 | 89 | 44.695 | 9.50706 | | 2022 | 1023 | 47.976 | 363 |354 | 73 | 34.604 | 7.37860 | |--+--++---++-++---| Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Description: PGP signature

General Resolution: Voting secrecy result

Hi, The result of the General Resolution is: Option 2 "Hide identities of Developers casting a particular vote and allow verification" The details of the results are available at: https://www.debian.org/vote/2022/vote_001 Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Descri

General Resolution: Change the resolution process: results

Hi, The winner of the General Resolution is: Choice 1: "Amend resolution process, set maximum discussion period" The details of the results are available at: https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_003 Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes

On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 11:58:55PM -0400, Olek Wojnar wrote: > Hi zigo, > > On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 6:16 PM Thomas Goirand wrote: > > > > > I'd be very much for leaving the decision of open/close to our > > secretary, with most votes open, and the possibility for him to decide > > when it should

Re: DEP-16 Confidential votes

On Sun, Apr 18, 2021 at 09:22:38PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > > No, please don't. We already have problems enough with HTML - a structured > form would need to be fully accessible, secure, validated. A signed email > is (relatively) more straightforward and has served us well for the last >

General Resolution: Statement regarding Richard Stallman's readmission to the FSF board result

Hi, The results of the General Resolution is: Option 7 "Debian will not issue a public statement on this issue" The details of the results are available at: https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_002 Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Debian Project Leader Election 2021 Results

|455 | 89 | 44.695 | 9.50706 | |--+--++---++-++---| Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: "gr_rms" rejected but "Debian Project Leader 2021 Election" worked

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 08:59:24AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi again, > > This is not GMAIL problem. This involves only My PC and Debian > servers. > > (I use gmail only for recieving mails. I send mail from my Debian > shell account using SSH when I use @debuian.org address to avoid mail > r

Re: [External] Re: ThinkPad laptops preinstalled Linux

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 05:10:11PM -0400, Mark Pearson wrote: > Hi Kurt > > On 6/12/2020 2:58 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 01:39:08PM +, Mark Pearson wrote: > > > > > > The good - Lenovo are expanding what they offer on Linux (we ha

Re: [External] Re: ThinkPad laptops preinstalled Linux

On Wed, Jun 03, 2020 at 01:39:08PM +, Mark Pearson wrote: > > The good - Lenovo are expanding what they offer on Linux (we had another big > announcement yesterday about doing full config on our workstations with > Ubuntu and RHEL). We're asking HW vendors to have Linux support upstream > i

Debian Project Leader Election 2020 Results

| |--+--++---++-++---| Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Description: PGP signature

General Resolution: init systems and systemd results:

Hi, The results of the General Resolution about init systems and systemd is: Option 2 "B: Systemd but we support exploring alternatives" The details of the results are available at: https://www.debian.org/vote/2019/vote_002 Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc D

Debian Project Leader Election 2019 Results

|322 | 57 | 30.320 | 6.58729 | | 2018 | 1001 | 47.457 | 343 |333 | 53 | 33.266 | 7.01674 | | 2019 | 1003 | 47.505 | 389 |378 | 59 | 37.687 | 7.95701 | |--+--++---++-++---| Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary

Re: Debian Project Leader Elections 2019: Call for nominations

On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 01:48:23PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 15337 March 1977, Sam Hartman wrote: > > > In fairness, I'd recommend that the nominations period be extended for > > some explicit time. I think that we want to have a known window for new > > nominations rather than say startin

DPL election 2019

Hi, This is the proposed timeline for the 2019 DPL election: Nomination period: Sunday 2019-03-03 - Saturday 2019-03-09 Campaigning period: Sunday 2019-03-10 - Saturday 2019-03-30 Voting period: Sunday 2019-03-31 - Saturday 2019-04-13 Kurt

Re: Appeal procedure for DAM actions

On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 09:43:27AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 11:53:38PM +0100, Karsten Merker wrote: > > > So while I agree there might be possible improvements in how the vote > > > goes, I > > > don't think just deleting that on

Re: Appeal procedure for DAM actions

On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 11:53:38PM +0100, Karsten Merker wrote: > > So while I agree there might be possible improvements in how the vote goes, > > I > > don't think just deleting that one sentence is it. > > I beg to differ :). I have taken a look at Ian's proposal with > using sqrt(people allo

Re: Appeal procedure for DAM actions

On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 07:28:34PM +0100, Luke Faraone wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jan 2019 at 19:07, Pierre-Elliott Bécue wrote: > > Le 9 janvier 2019 16:49:30 GMT+01:00, Kurt Roeckx a écrit : > > >I would try to use software that can run a vote like that, > > >where it'

Re: Appeal procedure for DAM actions

On Wed, Jan 09, 2019 at 04:28:41PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > Would this vote be secret? In some situation, I'd rather not vote than > having my vote disclosed. I'm very much OK for the secretary to see what > I voted for though. The voting would be secret. I think the only output should be

Re: Appeal procedure for DAM actions

On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 11:27:35PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > we waive the time limit defined in §1 for the cases > from the last 6 months. Would it make sense to have them 1 week from publishing this instead? Kurt

Re: Article 13 of the EU copyright review

On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 07:10:05PM +0100, Chris Lamb wrote: > https://savecodeshare.eu/ There is also https://saveyourinternet.eu/ Kurt

Debian Project Leader Election 2018 Results

| 5.87787 | | 2017 | 1062 | 48.882 | 327 |322 | 57 | 30.320 | 6.58729 | | 2017 | 1001 | 47.457 | 343 |333 | 53 | 33.266 | 7.01674 | |--+--++---++-++---| Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Description: PGP

Debian Project Leader Election 2017 Results

| 5.87787 | | 2017 | 1062 | 48.882 | 327 |322 | 57 | 30.320 | 6.58729 | |--+--++---++-++---| Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Description: PGP signature

General Resolution: Declassifying debian-private results

Hi, The results of the General Resolution about declassifying debian-private is: "Further Discussion". The details of the results are available at: https://www.debian.org/vote/2016/vote_002 Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Description: PGP signature

General Resolution: Replace Chairman with Chair

Hi, The results of the General Resolution is that the replacement of Chairman with Chair has been accepted. The details of the results are available at: https://www.debian.org/vote/2016/vote_003 Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Debian Project Leader Election 2016 Results

| 5.87787 | |--+--++---++-++---| Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Project assistent

Hi, For the avoidance of any doubt Neil McGovern is no longer the assitent of the secretary. Kurt signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2015 Results

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 10:00:56AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > the answer is 986 at present. So can you give me a list of those 986 so I can update the website? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact lis

Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2015 Results

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 09:28:34PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Kurt Roeckx dijo [Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:45:37AM +0200]: > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:41:52PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > > > > > > Sadly this list is trivially proved inaccurate > > >

Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2015 Results

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:41:52PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > > Sadly this list is trivially proved inaccurate So I have no source at all that is can tell me the number of DDs? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr

Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2015 Results

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 09:26:27AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:12:14PM +0200, Debian Project Secretary - > Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > Stats for the DPL votes: > > |--+--++---++-++-

Debian Project Leader Election 2015 Results

| |--+--++---++-++---| Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Debian Project Leader Elections 2015: Call for nominations

On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 11:48:54AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 08:06:11PM +0100, Debian Project Secretary - Kurt > Roeckx wrote: > > | Nomination | Wednesday, March 4th, 2015 | Tuesday, Marc

Re: The proper place to announce GRs (was Re: piece of mind (Re: Moderated posts?))

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 03:12:35PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > Dear Kurt, > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 09:17:27AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > If on -vote the required amount of seconds have been reached, I > > will announce that the GR process has been sarted on >

Re: The proper place to announce GRs (was Re: piece of mind (Re: Moderated posts?))

On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 10:32:35PM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:30:43PM +0100, Jonathan Dowland wrote: > > I think we should clearly indicate where GRs should be announced. > > ("Should", I suppose I'm arguing, not "must"). > > I think we don't need to name the place i

General Resolution: Code of conduct results

/codeofconduct/voters.txt Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: 20140407 keyring report

On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 09:41:40PM +, Clint Adams wrote: > Upon request. Made with an unpackaged set of keyrings[0]. Thanks for the update. So we had in january: DDs: 623 "DSA" 624 1024 DMs: 54 "DSA" 54 1024 non-upload: 0 "DSA" 0 1024 In february: DDs: 611

Debian Project Leader Election 2014 Results

| | 2012 | 948 | 46.184 | 436 |403 | 72 | 42.511 | 8.72589 | | 2013 | 988 | 47.149 | 402 |390 | 73 | 39.474 | 8.27170 | | 2014 | 1003 | 47.505 | 412 |401 | 61 | 39.980 | 8.44117 | |--+--++---++-++---| Kurt

Re: Following GR amendments evolution ? - Was: Re: General Resolution: Code of conduct

On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:18:10AM +0100, Olivier Berger wrote: > Hi. > > (not subscribed to debian-vote, so please CC me, eventually). > > Sorry if I'm unaware of details of our constitutional corpus and > procedures, but is there a way to track evolutions in a GR page like > [0], if not subscri

Re: GR proposal: code of conduct

On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 06:33:44PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:59:42AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This is to propose a general resolution under §4.1.5 of the constitution > > to propose a Debian code of conduct. >

Re: GR proposal: code of conduct

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:59:42AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > == > 1. The Debian project decides to accept a code of conduct for >participants to its mailinglists, IRC channels, and other modes of >communication within the project. So I've been wondering under which part of the co

Re: GR proposal: code of conduct

On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:59:42AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Hi all, > > This is to propose a general resolution under §4.1.5 of the constitution > to propose a Debian code of conduct. So I've put up a vote page with my current understanding at: https://www.debian.org/vote/2014/vote_002 I'

Re: GR proposal: code of conduct

On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 07:09:49PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: GR proposal: code of conduct"): > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 05:08:10PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > Wouter Verhelst writes ("GR proposal: code of conduct"): > >

Re: GR proposal: code of conduct

On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 05:08:10PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Wouter Verhelst writes ("GR proposal: code of conduct"): > > This is to propose a general resolution under §4.1.5 of the constitution > > to propose a Debian code of conduct. > > I second this proposal. I actually got a BAD signature

Re: GR proposal: code of conduct

On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 01:25:16PM -0500, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote: > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 05:08:10PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > >> Wouter Verhelst writes ("GR proposal: code of conduct"): > &g

Re: GR proposal: code of conduct

On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 05:08:10PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Wouter Verhelst writes ("GR proposal: code of conduct"): > > This is to propose a general resolution under §4.1.5 of the constitution > > to propose a Debian code of conduct. > > I second this proposal. I think that's the 4th second.

Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 11:39:40AM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init > systems"): > > On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 02:50:00PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > That doesn't contradict the GR. If the GR

Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 02:50:00PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init > systems"): > > There is also this decision of the CTTE: > > > >The TC chooses to not pass a resolution at the current time

Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 02:50:00PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init > systems"): > > There is also this decision of the CTTE: > > > >The TC chooses to not pass a resolution at the current time

Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 01:07:00PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init > systems"): > > On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 12:49:43PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > Putting the "notes and rubric" sectio

Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 12:49:43PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init > systems"): > > On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 12:35:15PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > This a GR proposal is a "position statemen

Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 12:35:15PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > This a GR proposal is a "position statement about issues of the day" > (as it says in the "Notes and rubric".) It's on the subject of init > systems. Therefore it is covered by this wording. But it also says: 1. Exercise of the TC

Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 01:06:46PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Kurt Roeckx (k...@roeckx.be) [140302 12:36]: > > On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 12:26:38PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > * Kurt Roeckx (k...@roeckx.be) [140302 12:23]: > > > > On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at

Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 12:26:38PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Kurt Roeckx (k...@roeckx.be) [140302 12:23]: > > On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 11:01:16AM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init > > > sys

Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

On Sun, Mar 02, 2014 at 11:01:16AM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > Kurt Roeckx writes ("Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init > systems"): > > This is probably going to require a 2:1 majority requirement as > > written. > > Do you agree that the i

Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init systems

On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 11:45:01PM +, Matthew Vernon wrote: > Hi, > > I wish to propose the following general resolution, and hereby call > for seconds. I don't think further lengthy discussion of the issues is > likely to be productive, and therefore hope we can bring this swiftly > to a vote

Re: State of the debian keyring

On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 11:19:23AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > On Feb 27, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > > > > Because unless you are paranoid, then it is not. > > > If anybody disagrees then please describe a credible threat model in > > > which: > > > - an entity would want to have access to the k

Re: State of the debian keyring

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:51:56AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Gunnar Wolf writes: > > Ian Jackson dijo [Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 05:57:57PM +]: > > >> I think this is a bug. > >> > >> It can increase security because it can make operations more > >> convenient at the same level of security, an

Re: State of the debian keyring

On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 04:29:29PM +, Bart Martens wrote: > > I would also find it acceptable that the keyring maintainers accept a > > signature from a single DD to replace the key, with that single DD being the > > DD's old key. > > I would not find this acceptable. I'm surprised you write

Re: State of the debian keyring

On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 07:57:43AM +, Marco d'Itri wrote: > gw...@gwolf.org wrote: > > >So, what do you suggest? > Persuade developers that they should sign the new key of people whose > old key they have already signed, with no need to meet them in person. I'm not sure what you're saying, bu

Re: State of the debian keyring

On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 06:35:06PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > I'd like to ask the project as a whole for input on how we should push > towards this migration. I guess that most of the socially-connected > Debian Developers already have 4096R keys. How can we reach those who > don't? How can we

Re: State of the debian keyring

On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 10:41:48PM +, Clint Adams wrote: > > Redone with debian-keyring 2014.01.31, hopenpgp-tools 0.6-1, > jq 1.3-1.1, and attached script: > > (/usr/share/keyrings/debian-keyring.gpg) [...] > Primary key pubkey sizes: > 612 1024 For those people who are not aware of th

Re: Questioning the TC's power to decide on technical policy

On Sat, Feb 08, 2014 at 06:48:25PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > I'm quite concerned at the current line of enquiry being pursued by > the Secretary in #727708. Ian, People ask me questions. Should I just ignore them because you think it's not a good time to answer them? I would also like to poin

Re: Debian SIP feedback?

On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 07:29:24PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 04/02/14 23:43, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 10:15:42PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> > >> > >> I'm just wondering if people have further feedback ab

Re: Debian SIP feedback?

On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 10:15:42PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > I'm just wondering if people have further feedback about the Debian SIP > service > > https://rtc.debian.org has just been updated to overcome some issues > with local audio feedback > > For Firefox/Iceweasel users, there have

Re: GR: Selecting the default init system for Debian

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 09:21:41AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > "Didier 'OdyX' Raboud" writes: > > Le dimanche, 19 janvier 2014, 12.39:01 Ian Jackson a écrit : > > >> I agree. I think that would be quite bad. We could explicitly state > >> in our TC resolution that the TC decision can be vacate

Re: Updating the Policy Editors delegation

On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 02:56:10PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 05:22:01PM +0100, Secretary - Kurt Roeckx a écrit : > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 12:10:08PM +, Neil McGovern wrote: > > > > As there has been no comments on the draft text I'll

Re: Updating the Policy Editors delegation

On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 12:10:08PM +, Neil McGovern wrote: > > All, > > I think me and Kurt have now reached consensus about the issue - and as > such we'd welcome any comments on the draft, available below! As there has been no comments on the draft text I'll make that the official response

Re: Updates in stable releases

On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 08:59:31PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Kurt Roeckx: > > > I want to start by giving some examples of things that got updated > > in stable point releases that I know about: > > - linux was 3.2.41-2 in 7.0, 3.2.51-1 in 7.3, 3.2.53-2 i

Re: Updates in stable releases

On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:42:39PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > One thing I had in mind for an update to apache is to have the > > version in stable support ECDHE which the version in stable > > currently doesn't do. And I think the general feeling from people > > is that this is going to be re

Updates in stable releases

Hi, I think in general we are either too strict in what we allow as updates to stable or people think it's not going to be allowed and so don't even try to get updates to stable. The last time I asked about this, I got this as reply: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/09/msg00466.html I

Re: Moving to stronger keys than 1024D

On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 10:37:40AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > > Oh mighty Debian keyring maintainers and WoT gurus, what do you suggest > to do in this respect? When is the right moment to retire old keys after > migration to stronger ones? I think that you clearly reached the point where

Re: Debian Maintainers Keyring changes

On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 02:01:43AM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > The following changes to the debian-maintainers keyring have just been > activated: > > sas...@girrulat.de > Removed key: A33FC3A59C40F1BCC3368E88FCA5101964F970D1 > Removed key: E67DF5E7FCFAB7218C6D0FAF610711E66630FEFA

Re: Survey of new contributors -- results

On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 09:52:41PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > | It seems that we could get better at listing possible contributions. For > | example, we could have a 'apt-list-possible-contributions' tool that would > | list installed packages that are orphaned or RFAed. Like wnpp-alert? Kur

Debian Project Leader Election 2013 Results

| 948 | 46.184 | 436 |403 | 72 | 42.511 | 8.72589 | | 2013 | 988 | 47.149 | 402 |390 | 73 | 39.474 | 8.27170 | |--+--++---++-++---| Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Description: Digital signature

DPL election 2013

Hi, I've set the DPL timetable for the DPL election to: - Nomination: March 3 to March 9 - Campaign: March 10 to March 30 - Vote: March 31 to April 13 I've also put it on the vote page: http://www.debian.org/vote/2013/vote_001 I'll do a call for nominations later, probably on friday evening. K

Re: LaMont Jones, WTH are you doing?

On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 11:33:39AM -0700, LaMont Jones wrote: > [...] binaries are built > on a system that is running sid, both amd64 and i386 binaries, since at > least one of those buildds has bitten me with bad binaries in the past. [...] > The packages you're seeing are built on a sid amd64 bo

Re: Position statements short of a GR - DPL statements

On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 04:24:16PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > A little while ago I wrote this: > > > I think it would be useful to add a new category to this list: > > > > - Formal policy document from the DPL [...] > And I would hope that a decision to publish such a statement would be > a de

Re: General Resolution: Diversity statement results

On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 06:45:46PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 05:08:52PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > > > If I could get a copy of the Secretary's running source code I could > > also change it so that options were lettered rather than numbere

Re: devotee predictable random numbers (was: General Resolution: Diversity statement results)

On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 02:22:12PM +0300, Touko Korpela wrote: > On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 12:00:19AM -0700, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > > > Once I get my act together again, I have devotee v 2.0 that I > > think is generally useful enough to package, since I have moved it to a > > command

Re: General Resolution: Diversity statement results

On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 05:08:52PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > If I could get a copy of the Secretary's running source code I could > also change it so that options were lettered rather than numbered. > That would be /much/ less confusing... master.debian.org:/org/vote.debian.org/ It's about t

General Resolution: Diversity statement results

http://master.debian.org/~secretary/diversity/results.png The tally sheet is at: http://master.debian.org/~secretary/diversity/tally.txt The list of people voting is at: http://master.debian.org/~secretary/diversity/voters.txt Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Description

Re: Fool copy of a Debian web side.

On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 12:22:47PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > depending on what portion of the "website" you would like to have a copy > off you might > > * sudo apt-get install debian-reference debian-policy developers-reference > installation-guide-amd64 > > to get necessary documenta

Debian Project Leader Election 2012 Results

| 8.65836 | | 2012 | 948 | 46.184 | 436 |403 | 72 | 42.511 | 8.72589 | |--+--++---++-++---| Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Debian Project Leader Election 2011 Results

| 8.65836 | |--+--++---++-++---| Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: buildd/porter/maintainer roles again

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 11:07:50PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > I am not asking for throwing away people's work or ignoring their motivation, > but I feel demotivated that I am asked efforts with nothing in return, > since--and this is what makes this mail more or less on-topic in this > thread-

Re: Squeeze, firmware and installation

On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 02:13:30PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Yup, definitely. We already have an "unofficial non-free" area on > cdimage.debian.org which is where we've been pushing the firmware > zip/tar.gz files already. I'll set up the extra images to be dropped > in there. It would be nic

Re: Squeeze, firmware and installation

On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 09:57:46PM +0300, Arto Jantunen wrote: > > Hmm. Is the release already so close that it's time to have this > flamewar again? Shouldn't we wait a month or two for maximal effect? I think the earlier we have this discussion the better. > Seriously speaking, to me it seems

Squeeze, firmware and installation

Hi, It seems the kernel team has moved alot of firmware to non-free, which means that more people will need to use pieces from non-free to be able to use their computer. So I was wondering what the state is of everything, and what issues people will run into, specially when installing. I'm also

Debian Project Leader Election 2010 Results

| |--+--++---++-++---| Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Withdrawal of GR about sponsorship requirements for GRs

er of seconds. The discussion about this GR has stopped over 4 weeks ago, so I'm withdrawing this under section A.5. of the constitution. Sponsors of any of the proposals have 1 week to object. More info about this GR can be seen at: http://www.debian.org/vote/2009/vote_002 Kurt Roeckx Debi

Debian Project Leader Election 2009 Results

| 9.98343 | | 2008 | 1075 | 49.181 | 425 |401 | 35 | 37.302 | 8.15356 | | 2009 | 1013 | 47.741 | 366 |361 | 43 | 35.636 | 7.56155 | |--+--++---++-++---| Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Description

First call for votes for the Debian Project Leader Elections 2009

y/n/23aDdruvkv4thb4f3LQhxtAKLJ3DSIf8fGjRzfIfX9jnMhjJSPdoSpLtWScW zzS5Hj74RTRBLzFakOrasluITwQYEQIADwUCSc0zSwIbDAUJABe7AAAKCRBWJrUv kcuEqFYIAKCtVUpHkkHEm3XWnvKooxY4yzJ3DgCghtOdEUkPVR0YS02o+9Ptmact Lxs= =CFD2 -END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Kurt Roeckx Debian Project Secretary signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: New Technical Committee Members

On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:57:31AM -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote: > Anthony Towns recently announced his decision to step down from > the Debian Technical Committee: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2009/01/msg6.html > > I thank him on behalf of the rest of the committee and the > proj

Re: Updated Debian Maintainers Keyring

On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 05:32:03PM +, Anthony Towns wrote: > > dm:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Full name: Jelmer Vernooij > Added key: B3634EEAEEF17128A64F34A716F9CB0085E26E51 > Added key: F1F3A87ED983DFAD791ADAD83DAF54A21EEF5276 > Added key: 9C94A3D863D34E71CFA0781E0CB425E1060F66E5 >

Re: Explications needed...

On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 11:20:30AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > An arm buildd maintainer not reading [EMAIL PROTECTED] is simply not > doing his job as buildd maintainer. You can't pretend to be the one > handling builds for the whole archive while not following discussions > around problems sp

Re: Note to "Did you already MOO today..."

On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 08:54:56AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:51:35 +0100, Jakob Johannes Blaette > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > Hello, Debain, first of all thank you for the Distribution of DEBIAN > > that I appreciate. > > Thanks. > > > I am Comput

  1   2   >