On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 12:22:15AM +1100, Edward C. Lang wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 05:14:23PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > In fact there was one rather controversial regular at the time who'd
> > > been rejected as a maintainer.
> >
> > Who was that? Maybe it will help jog my memor
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 12:16:09AM -0700, Brian F. Kimball wrote:
> At first I thought "and/or" was awkward, but the constitution uses it
> six times, so it's not a problem. :)
and/or is legalese for what most human being understand by 'or'.
In legal documents, 'or' may be interpreted as an 'exc
On Thu, Jul 13, 2000 at 01:49:01AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Well, since I have recieved only positive responses, how about
> this draft rewording of section 4.1.5 of the constitution.
[snip]
> +5. Issue and modify nontechnical policy documents and statements.
> +
s will be able to provide non-voting Debian maintainers for
> DFSG-free packages.
Why non-voting? If the maintainers are willing to agree to the DFSG,
then their work need not be incompatible with being full members.
Jules
--
Jules Bean |Any sufficie
tlines some ideals, about what makes 'free' software in
our opinion. Certainly there are both ideological and practical
reasons to prefer DFSG-free software.
What this debate is about is where this compromise stands --- the
relative importance of producing a good distribution over a f
expects/ you to install them
(which is rarely a package).
In the specific case of lyx, since I'm the lyx maintainer, if this
resolution passes I will distribute xforms debs from my personal
website until lyx goes totally free (very likely to be before the
release of woody).
Jules
--
Jules
On Sun, 7 Nov 1999, Decklin Foster wrote:
> Richard Braakman writes:
>
> > In the meantime, the boot-floppies NEED HELP. If you want to get
> > involved, you can check out their code with this command:
> > cvs -d [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/debian-boot co boot-floppies
> > Make sure that CVS_RSH is
7 matches
Mail list logo
