by the time you get the other steps complete, his key
will be updated in the keyring.
My 2 cents...
Jim Westveer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
On 17-Sep-2000 Christian Surchi wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm processing my first NM and I'm in identification process. He is Tom
> Ca
Correct
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Clay !
--
Jim Westveer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 16-Sep-2000 Clay Crouch wrote:
> Greets! :^)
>
> I have recently approved the application of one Risko Gergely.
>
> Now, to whom do I send the reports?
>
> From
situation.
If I can help
Jim Westveer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 15-Sep-2000 John O Sullivan wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm processing my first new developer at the moment. Everything has checked
> out so far so I'm not concerned about his identity. However I asked him for
&g
rust than having ones key put in the
Debian keyring.
At least to me, it does not seem to be unreasonable to ask for
some form of id.
IMHO
--
Jim Westveer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Bother," said
On 30-Jul-2000 Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Hi Jim!
>
> On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, Jim Westveer wrote:
>
>> However, by signing an ID, or the email, I have demonstrated
>> that I do infact, possess that private key.
>
> IIRC, it was required that you sign your applicatio
,
just that the applicant should not only provide their public
key, but also prove that they can sign something with their
private key.
Just my thoughts.
Jim Westveer Hi.
>
> Since the new list debian-newmaint-discuss was created (Thanks list-admins!)
> I think this topic should be mo
6 matches
Mail list logo
