Ian Jackson writes:
> If someone made arguments along those lines I would advise the
> Secretary to say that these things are matters for the DPL, and that
> if a Developer feels that the DPL has overstepped the mark they should
> use a General Resolution to do so.
>
> Likewise, if the TC is over
Arno Töll writes:
> On 10.12.2013 18:02, Enrico Zini wrote:
>> it looks like as soon as one becomes DD, an email arrives from Google
>> recruiters.
>
> actually it's good enough to post on Debian mailing lists. Every now and
> then the usual suspects [1][2] seem to write everyone appearing on lis
Steve McIntyre writes:
> Hi folks,
>
> Based on some of the *heated* discussions that have happened on the
> lists recently, I've organised a DebConf BoF session so we can
> (hopefully) have a productive session on the topic of package
> maintenance and how to hand over / take over packages.
>
>
unsubscribe
Thus spoke Nikos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 2003-04-07 21:21:15:
> > Because someone packaged them, and someone uses (installed)
> > them. Whether it is easy to find on the web, is irrelevant, as there
> > are still people who are not connected 24/7, and prefer to install a
> > package, and read it off
> I don't understand why the packages anarchism, bible-kjv and
> bible-kjv-text (in section doc) are Debian packages. They are no
> technical documentation, they don't correspond (in my eyes) to open
> source's philosophy, they can be easily found on the WWW...
Because someone packaged them, and s
> Once again, what do you people think?
I too, would welcome a move to OFTC.
pgpRoN3U8q8Dq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
(Resending mail, with a hopefully verifiable signature)
> 4. Item proposed to vote (after the discussion period)
>
> [ ] I accept the ratification of IRC channels as a communication medium
> and as such they have to follow the usual Debian policies (adapted
> for IRC habits)
I second thi
> 4. Item proposed to vote (after the discussion period)
>
> [ ] I accept the ratification of IRC channels as a communication medium
> and as such they have to follow the usual Debian policies (adapted
> for IRC habits)
I second this GR proposal.
--
Gergel
9 matches
Mail list logo
