-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, the first BSP of 2008 in Zurich [1], Switzerland
came to an end. It was a very successful event.
On 12 and 13 January, 16 people hacked on Debian all day (and through the
night) and managed to close a fair number of bugs:
42 RC, 24 non RC,
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 19:04:19 +0100
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=FCrkan_Seng=FCn?= wrote:
> > > I'd hope to see kdedesktop, gnomedesktop and officeapps tasks,
> > > or pick just one desktop. Oh well.
> > >=20
> > > Please file a bug against tasksel, if it bothers one enough.
Hi Jalogne
> i've spend a long time to learn on the book bought with my RedHat package, and
> now i'm used to the basic commands and the folders structure (/etc /user
> /dev,...)
The directory structure is the same as in you also have /etc, /usr and /dev.
> I wonder if it's quite the same with De
> I am setting up a server for counter-strike and i was wondering if
> this "debian" version is compatable with it.
if you are refering to the actual version, yes it is.
> Most linux servers i see
> running counter-strike are redhat users.
most computer shipped are windows preinstalled, and alot u
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 20:56:37 +0100
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 08:16:24PM +0100, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
> > it's usefule when browsing at packages.debian.org too!
> Well hopefully, packages.d.o will be migrated to package tags as well,
&
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004 01:53:40 +0100
Michael Banck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 05:56:12PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> > Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > > shells 292
> > > news327
> > > embedded383
> > > electronics 515
> > > oldlibs
> What do you think about counting wmaker and all its apps also as gnustep
> applications?
They depend on X, which GNUstep applications don't. Personally
I would not put them into the gnustep section, also because
they do not use the GNUstep framework. However they can be recommended
or suggested
> On topic: I don't really think a section for this few packages is worth
> it.
I think it is worth because
gnustep *clearly* does not belong in the x11 section.
> Package count (binary, unstable of two days ago, without contrib and
> non-free) is below, and it shows that even the smallest section
>> I believe we need a new section called "gnustep", just like we have one
>> for gnome and kde.
> I think this is a good idea. Would it start by being populated with
> anything depending on gnustep*, or did I not think that through? What
> packages would that give?
Yep, this would also help me hav
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 09:11:38 +0100
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gürkan Sengün wrote:
> > I believe we need a new section called "gnustep", just
> > like we have one for gnome and kde.
>
> Howe many GNUstep packages are there?
if i do, apt-c
I believe we need a new section called "gnustep", just
like we have one for gnome and kde.
And then GNUstep packages can be given a proper section,
like "gnustep". x11 is wrong because GNUstep is not depending on x11, x11 is
only one of several possible backends.
|$ apt-cache show gworkspace
|Pac
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 04:01:00 -0500
"Moeen Alinaghian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi moeen
http://www.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/
you can download the first .iso image then burn it
cdrecord -scanbus
cdrecord -v speed=8 dev=0,1,0 -data the.iso
yours
gürkan
pgpprno334M3c.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:34:33 +0100
Christine Hinrichsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello - I have got a very general question: where did you find the
> white-grey surface of your logo on the desktop - is it a real stone
> or wall in a cavern? Does it mean to you anything? And the spiral or
> h
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 19:11:07 +0100
Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, I've found not one, but quite a number of "shops":
you forgot the parody debian shop
http://www.cafepress.com/lesbianlinux/
yours
gürkan
pgpMr4HB4Ajuz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
14 matches
Mail list logo
