ransition document!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpStVF3KHZkf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 07:44:55 +0900 Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 06:34:52PM +0200, Francesco Poli a écrit :
> >
> > In the meanwhile, what I was proposing was that the licensing of the
> > Debian Open Use Logo should not create a deliberate incompatibilit
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 09:00:08 +0200 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:31:55PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > There are two issues with your previous reply:
> >
> > * it was not clear that your request for more info also included
> > questions abo
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:52:58 + Clint Adams wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:31:55PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > For reasons I won't elaborate on here (they would drive us far away
> > from the topic under discussion), I consider the GNU GPL v3 as a
> > lice
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012 09:17:53 +0200 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 09:31:41PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > I am following up to your August bits from the DPL, since I still have
> > to understand why it was suggested to dual license the Open Use Logo
&
am not subscribed to this list;
please Cc me on replies. Thanks.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
. Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpKAS5w58Ss6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 10:46:34 +0100 Philip Hands wrote:
> Francesco Poli writes:
>
> ...
> > [...]
> >> \item You cannot alter the DEBIAN trademarks in any way.
> > [...]
> >> \item Any scaling must retain the original proportions of the logo.
> >
ianArt/Themes/Joy
I think that these restrictions should be dropped entirely, since they
seem to be incompatible with the basic Free Software principles.
P.S.: I am not subscribed to debian-project, so please Cc me on
replies. Thanks.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2
e I spent in analyzing CC licenses... :-(
P.S.: I am not subscribed to debian-project, so please Cc me on
replies, if any. Thanks.
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
....
Paul for notifying us!
--
http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt
New GnuPG key, see the transition document!
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpK7CuhhDGVE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
n /usr/share/common-licenses/.
Please see bug #284340 [4], which was unfortunately tagged wontfix...
[4] http://bugs.debian.org/284340
Big disclaimers: IANAL, TINLA, IANADD, TINASOTODP.
--
http://frx.netsons.org/doc/index.html#nanodocs
The nano-document series is here!
.
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 19:41:06 +0100 MJ Ray wrote:
> Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > Was the discussion held on debian-legal (back in April)
> > intentionally left over?
>
> Yes, it was intentionally left out. It seemed to be discussing
> Propos
to both debian-legal
and debian-project.
Disclaimers: IANAL, IANADD.
P.S.: I'm subscribed to debian-legal, but not to debian-project; no need
to Cc: me, so long as debian-legal is in the loop...
--
http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/testing_workstation_install.html
Need to read a Debian
ebian-legal is in the loop...
--
http://frx.netsons.org/doc/nanodocs/testing_workstation_install.html
Need to read a Debian testing installation walk-through?
..... Francesco Poli .
GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B
On Wed, 02 Feb 2005 02:24:42 + MJ Ray wrote:
[...]
> Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > [...] I try to approach its copyright holders and
> > persuade them to change license.
> > In order to be more credible when I point out the issues that makes
> > a license non-free
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 02:12:58 + MJ Ray wrote:
> Mark Brown > > For what it's worth I'd noticed that the summaries had
> vanished - Francesco Poli > So did I.
>
> Thanks for that
You are welcome! :)
> and the comments off-list. What would the period
>
ely.
I personally read all Eclipse-related debian-legal threads, but I would
have waited for a summary if I could *hope* to see one...
--
Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.
......
Francesco Poli
17 matches
Mail list logo
