Hi Steve,
Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 08:51:15PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>
>Thanks for bringing this up, our ITS definitely needs love. I
>investigated the ITS team in 2010 and found it was already broken
>(although one member disagreed with that assessment
Hi Paul,
Paul Wise wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 8:51 AM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> However, I am not convinced that development of bugs.debian.org should go
> through Debbugs development. Unfortunately, I am not an ITS-s expert, and I
> can't recommend a particular engine.
re investing in Debbugs.
[...]
- debbugs submissions via http (C: ? ask asheesh)
I imagine this won't be news, but this is tracked in #590269. Interesting
project by the way (although I miss that less since I moved to reportbug-ng).
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.
Hi Daniel,
On 2013-09-22 06:46, Daniel Pocock wrote:
[...]
On 29/08/13 20:39, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
It also briefly mentions the "fundraising path" and the "press path",
which are rarely directly accessible for newcomers. Your talk shows
improvements which could be d
ather file an RFH (or find some other way to
attribute that information directly to the package)? If it means a change would
take too much time for them or require too much skills, then the fields
discussed above appear to be less relative solutions. If it means a change is
important, an importance field as discussed in #704874 would be more meaningful.
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
never heard about any DebTags usage from PackageKit. And what happened
to synaptic-debtags? Oh, packages.debian.org uses Debtags. Hum, not as much as
it could I guess.
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
g did you drive on the support path?
[] Haven't started yet [] A few minutes [] A few hours [] More than 10
hours
How long did you drive on the translation path?
[] Haven't started yet [] A few minutes [] A few hours [] More than 10
hours
(etcetera, with more care given to phrasing)
While we're at it, have there been surveys of Debian contributors asking about
their careers, their relation to Debian/software, and how much experience (in
software development, free software development and/or peer production
projects) they had when they started contributing to Debian?
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
On 2013-08-09 03:53, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 08/08/13 at 17:23 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
[...]
[...]
Q1: Can you (briefly) introduce yourself? What motivated you to
start contributing to Debian? What are you (trying to) contribute
to in Debian
utors
collaboration in packaging, with statistics on the proportion of
team-maintained vs private packages?
Actionable items:
[...]
- have a more introductory documentation to BTS usage
...or just ease ITS contributions.
[...]
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.
the team"
requires).
FTP trainees are not requested currently. I understand from this that package
processing should be [re]listed.
--
Filipus Klutiero
http://www.philippecloutier.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscr
unarchive 704874
reopen 704874
thanks
Hi Russ,
Russ Allbery wrote:
Daniel Pocock writes:
> On 07/04/13 03:48, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>> The ITS currently assigns each ticket a severity. This is very useful
>> for users, for example by letting them check the wors
Hi Don,
Don Armstrong wrote:
On Sun, 14 Apr 2013, Chris Knadle wrote:
> On Saturday, April 13, 2013 13:34:23, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Apr 2013, Chris Knadle wrote:
[...]
> > Why should there be consequences that you can see?
>
> A man you work with is treating you badly [...]
Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2013-04-06, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> It's not a /good/ way in absolute terms, but it's pretty much the only
> way for now, so I guess it's currently the best way (see
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2011/11/msg00030.html ).
My ex
Hi Russ,
Russ Allbery wrote:
Chris Knadle writes:
> On Thursday, April 11, 2013 23:49:18, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>> In absolute terms, contacting ow...@bugs.debian.org is not a good way
>> of dealing with any problem, as ow...@bugs.debian.org is - as indica
On 2013-05-08 22:03, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
On 2013-05-08 21:48, Paul Wise wrote:
On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:15 AM, Andre Felipe Machado wrote:
Read more about why NASA migrated the ISS laptops to Debian GNU/Linux:
http://www.zdnet.com/to-the-space-station-and-beyond-with-linux-714958
Hi Chris,
On Saturday, April 06, 2013 19:55:08, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> thanks for being faithful to our project and bringing up this topic :-S
>
> Chris Knadle wrote:
> >From the point of view of the bug reporter, the message the DD has sent
> >
Ian Jackson wrote:
If you and your allies have enough time and knowledge to help with the
package, then yes, you can certainly help with this.
You could write to the maintainers:
I notice you closed my bug without comment, so I went to take a look
at the rest of the bugs for gnomovision.
Ian Jackson wrote:
[...] Of course we do need bug reports to be able to tell what's wrong so
that we know what to fix. But many packages have so many bug reports
that there is already not enough time to deal with them all
thoroughly. In that case it is better to cherry-pick the ones which
seem
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-project@lists.debian.org
The ITS currently assigns each ticket a severity. This is very useful
for users, for example by letting them check the worst problems of a
package without having to read its entire ticket list.
Severity
Hi Ian,
Ian Jackson wrote:
[...] To reiterate: the purpose of bug reports is to help improve the
software. In Debian, the maintainer(s) are in charge of deciding (in
the first instance) what counts as an improvement, and which
improvements are most important. But they are also in charge of
dec
Hi Chris,
thanks for being faithful to our project and bringing up this topic :-S
Chris Knadle wrote:
From the point of view of the bug reporter, the message the DD has sent
(whether intended or not) is "I'm not even going to dignify this with a
response. *click* " It's not /only/ this rudene
[Moving this to -project]
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 05:37:18PM -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
> Technically the DAM has the ability to act to remove a DD (per Debian
> Constitution 8.1 item 2), but the information I can gather so far seems to
> indicate that the DAM won't
Hi Moray,
Moray Allan wrote:
There's been some discussion elsewhere about how young people's
experience of computers has changed over the years, and how this might
interact with our success in recruiting young people into Debian. I
would estimate that the conversation focused on 16-20 year-old
Hi Jakub,
Jakub Wilk wrote:
AFAIK Matthew Garrett hasn't been "active and directly involved
participant in the Debian development community" for years. What is
the reason for keeping his blog on planet.d.o?
Matthew Garrett resigned from Debian 6 years ago:
http://mjg59.livejournal.com/66647
Despite a recent claim to the contrary which reached this forum, there
is still one logo which is non-free. The Debian Official Use Logo is
still only distributed under a restrictive and confusing license. The
information on the website is still up-to-date:
http://www.debian.org/logos/index.en.
Hi Stefano, Russ and everyone,
thanks for your interest in this topic. I entirely agree that we should
do better in this area. Since the discussion problem is not specific to
debian-devel, I'm moving this to debian-project.
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:11:23AM -0700, R
On 2012-04-27 01:36, Kevin Mark wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 06:00:21PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
Otherwise, our lack of diversity can either be seen as a
desired/voluntary state of things, or as the result of a failure to
recruit "minorities". Here again, I'd be surpris
Le Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 05:27:22PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
>
> By the letter of the Constitution, the DPL cannot bless the diversity
> statement as a position statement of the Project, even if there is
> consensus on it. Nor can Developers as a whole, unless they vote, no
> matter
Hi Stefano,
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 09:47:04PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> The message from Stefano Zacchiroli quoted below includes a wrap-up
> (of the wrap-up (of the...)) about the statement on diversity in
> contributors proposed by Frances
Thank you again Luca and Tollef. I linked to this preview from
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DSA#Hardware_replacement_plan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debia
The message from Stefano Zacchiroli quoted below includes a wrap-up (of
the wrap-up (of the...)) about the statement on diversity in
contributors proposed by Francesca Ciceri.
Stefano asked to publish it in #669011, although the statement is not
approved.
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Fri, Mar
Hi Tollef,
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Filipus Klutiero
> Great. Is this plan written? If so, it would be a good idea to make it
> available.
I'll see what we can get done. There's a bit of cleanup to be done,
since we don't want to publish all the information from ou
Hi Stefano,
On 2012-04-15 14:19, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[...]
Highlight: long-term hardware replacement planning
==
The highlight for this month is long term planning of hardware
replacement. It's something I've been discussing with DSA for q
Hi Jose,
Jose Luis Rivas wrote:
On 04/11/2012 09:37 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Hi,
> in February, Stefano Zacchiroli added a document titled "Debian
Position on
[...]
> 5. A request/demand that people concerned with specific patent
issues do not
> share their conc
Hi MJ,
MJ Ray wrote:
[...]
Also, can the DPL really not just issue this position statement
as a "decision for whom noone else has responsibility"? I'm
pretty sure the DPL procedure (such as it is) was followed: that
zack solicited views and made a decision he felt to be consistent
with the c
Hi,
in February, Stefano Zacchiroli added a document titled "Debian Position
on Software Patents" to our website: http://www.debian.org/legal/patent
This document includes both a position and a policy regarding software
patents. It states:
1.
Debian will not knowingly distribute softwa
Hi Tollef,
]] Filipus Klutiero
Hi,
> Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > ]] Filipus Klutiero
> >
> > > It is concerning that we no longer receive enough hardware donations
> > > to meet our needs. I can only encourage these improvements to
> > &
Thank you Tollef,
Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Filipus Klutiero
> It is concerning that we no longer receive enough hardware donations
> to meet our needs. I can only encourage these improvements to
> donations pages. Specifically, if we lack any significant hardware,
> let
Thanks for this report Luca. Thanks to the whole DSA for having this
meeting, and for your tremendous work in general.
Luca Filipozzi wrote:
Historically, Debian's hardware requirements have been met through the
generous donation of new and used equipment by individuals and
organizations. This
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
The Debian Projecthttp://www.debian.org/
Debian Position on Software Patents pr...@lists.debian.org
February 19th, 2012http://www.debian.org/News/2012/20120219
Hi Stefano,
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 01:13:46PM -0500, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> I believe the first thing to do is to make project leadership
> transparent. For as long as the constitution will give it such a
> crucial role, and as long as it will be
Le 2011-10-09 09:48, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
[...]
- I've made the "private email aliases considered harmful" point [10],
in a somehow unrelated thread. I ask you to watch out for interactions
in Debian that could happen only through private email addresses.
There are some cases wh
On 2011-02-01 10:54, Joey Hess wrote:
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
ask.debian.net
- 318 questions submitted
- 554 users
(I can't find out to determine how many votes have been submitted, but
someone can, it would be a nice addition.)
Similar stats for forums.debian.net would be nice. In both ca
Thanks Paul, interesting stats, although I wonder how many of the users
and pages are legitimate rather than created by spammers.
On 2011-01-31 20:05, Paul Wise wrote:
Some Debian wiki stats:
7760 users (plus 266 disabled)
8670 pages (13425 since it began)
http://wiki.debian.org/PageCount
37
On 2010-08-31 09:46, Debian Project wrote:
The Debian Projecthttp://www.debian.org/
Debian Project mourns the loss of Frans Pop pr...@debian.org
August 31st, 2010 ht
Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Christoph Berg, 2010-06-09]
>
> > Too few MUAs have a button for "don't bother me about new mail
> > in this (sub-)thread".
>
> I wish all off-topic mails were marked with "OT" tag in the subject,
> dovecot moves such mails (including the ones tagged with "VAC") to a
> d
Ok, well, I'll wait for the machinery to be sorted out and then we can
talk about the actual proposal.
Thanks,
Ian.
Same for me. I went quickly over what happened, but please notify us
when the specification is ready to be reviewed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists
* Holger Levsen [2009-02-15 18:09]:
> And second, I have no real clue how useful our streaming efforts
> are, I believe the recordings are useful, but in both cases feedback
> from people who find them useful is appreciated!
I find them incredibly useful. There's so much going on at FOSDEM
tha
So this means ignoring any concerns and pressing on regardless?
Which concerns would have been ignored?
[...]
Regards,
--
MJR/slef
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Thanks for writing to my email address; I'm not subscribed to the list as you
may have realized.
Le December 29, 2008 06:59:30 am MJ Ray, vous avez écrit :
> Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > MJ Ray wrote:
> > > I consider filtered indices, auto-responses, shadow lists of onl
MJ Ray wrote:
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > Various messages in this thread have suggested using the votes as the
> > basis of a recommendation system for messages or authors.
> Ah, do you consider a "filtered thread index" as a recommendation list?
> El
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > I see that http://www.grouplens.org has moved on and their research
> > (like http://www.grouplens.org/node/126 - "The recommendations that
> > are most accurate according to the standard metrics are sometimes not
> > the recommendations
Filipus Klutiero wrote: [...]
> I'm not aware of any software with such a feature that would fit for
> Debian. I also couldn't find any in a quick search. [...]
It sounded a lot like the old GroupLens usenet tool to me.
http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/gnu
Hi Charles,
Le Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 01:31:31AM -0500, Filipus Klutiero a écrit :
> A long exchange between two people can be interesting, or not.
Hi Filipus,
it is exactly because it can not be known if a long exchange is interesting
before reading it that tools to ignore long exchanges can
Note that voting can have a similar drawback -- in that if you've got
enough like-minded people voting for a particular viewpoint (eg, "Joe
Random sucks, give him what for!") people with a different viewpoint
(eg, "stop berating people, argh") aren't going to bother voting ("the
score's already +
Just to add to the brainstorm, an incremental counter measuring how many emails
one person sent to the list in a 24-h window could be very useful to directly
ignore people when they start to play ping-pong.
I doubt it. I'd like to see evidence that posting patterns can
efficiently estimate the i
It would be great to see voting/scoring/rating of messages implemented.
Like Russ, I doubt that implementing this would be worth it inside the
email paradigm. Whatever approach you choose, keep in mind Debian is
only one of the projects that could benefit from such a system. I admit
I'm not aw
Can someone make a reasonable approximation to an official comment
on the timeline for KDE 4.x getting beyond experimental, and
traversing unstable/testing/stable?
Ask on debian-kde... if no one already did.
--
To UN
Do you really honestly believe that people should join a team when they
can't get along with the existing members. Do you really honestly believe
that saying that the ability to get along is expected is a bad thing?
Saying that one "needs to be able to deal with all the existing team
members
non-free is mentioned during the installer for users to add (I think)
It's not mentioned normally at least. Is it mentioned in expert installs?
Yes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
non-free is mentioned during the installer for users to add (I think)
It's not mentioned normally at least. Is it mentioned in expert installs?
Yes.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I haven't been following this thread super-close, so sorry if I missed
someone already throwing this out there.
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-system-distribution-guidelines.html
Thanks, this had not been mentioned yet, and I missed the addition of
these guidelines. The guidelines are very
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>>
>> > Translated to the current way things are done, this means that
>> according > to Richard, the Debian website or Debian refer to the
>> existence of the >
> Translated to the current way things are done, this means that according
> to Richard, the Debian website or Debian refer to the existence of the
> non-free component in a way that suggests getting non-free software from
> there.
>
> I'm very curious what part of the website or Debian wo
My understanding of RMS's position is that he would like Debian to follow
something like the rule that the FSF has about not linking to any non-free
software from their sites, which would mean that we couldn't even tell our
users that non-free existed in standard documentation.
I initially tho
I could help to set-up the infrastructure and providing
the non-free.org domain, but I don't think I have enough
infrastructure to handle the machines.
I'm afraid you'd be wasting your time. I don't think the problem is the
domain name hosting non-free. Richard Stallman wrote:
Thus, the de
- If it something passed NEW last time, should that necessarily happen
the next time as well?
Unless the problem that was missed is serious, or its severity is higher
in the newest version, yes.
An oversight does not invalidate the problem, does it?
Spotting the problem does not con
Le Sunday 29 June 2008 11:20:00 am Steve McIntyre, vous avez écrit :
> Hey folks,
>
> As you may remember, back before I started the DPL job I promised to
> run a survey. Then I pestered a huge number of people to answer a set
> of questions and get back to me. I've taken longer than I hoped to
> r
* Craig Witherspoon:
> If you do not start doing something realistic about the NVIDIA drivers
> you are going to destroy your installed user base.
Our users buy their graphics cards from AMD, or use Intel on-board
graphics.
Don't you think this is hasty generalization? Hint: Debian distributes
Please let me know what types of restrictions we might be facing and
if there are any considerations we need to make on our end.
Michael already pointed you to the Debian Open Use Logo License. You
cannot use the logo this way.
Additionally, "Debian" is a trademark. You can see the Trademark
Lic
> I hope we can lift this ban in a few days, when the involved people
> have calmed down.
This was "a few days" ago, and there are hints that the ban is problematic, so
I recommend to either lift the ban, renew the ban with a more convincing
reasoning than the high number of mails sent or downgra
MJ Ray:
> Drew Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-11-28 at 21:05 +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > ...Due to unfortunate [1]circumstances the weekly
> > > newsletter stopped being released weekly
> > >
> > > 1. http://www.dunc-tank.org/
> >
> > Give it a rest alright, won't you?
MJR:
I am not taking the "pretending" flame-bait this time. There
is no reason to doubt my sincerity. Argue I'm misguided if
you want, but don't resort to public attacks on me.
I could see some reasons, but I'm happy to skip these and consider that
both of us were misguided since you seem
Warning: the following is unlikely to be interesting, unless you agreed with MJR
MJR:
The reason people ignore the thread opener is because it's trolling, not
because it targets debian-women.
If Steve Langasek had continued to ignore it, rather than posting
flamebait, I wouldn't have asked th
MJR:
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please stop dignifying this waste of flesh by holding a conversation with
him.
Do you think it's fine to ignore good advice on dealing with
disruptive behaviour just because the target is debian-women?
*Shrug*
The reason people ignore the thread ope
Thanks Christian for bringing this discussion to d-project.
There's already some interesting discussion that happened about the
topic, but I am not very satisfied with "suite", and would rather see
the discussion go on. I discussed the issues I see with "suite" with
Christian on #debian-l10n-f
Sven Luther a écrit :
>[...]
>What else can i say, i just want to point out one thing from your own
post :
>
>On Fri, May 05, 2006 at 03:49:06PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>
>
>>Sven wrote :
>>
>>
>>>Indeed. My one-email-per-day-per-th
Indeed. My one-email-per-day-per-thread ipolicy is suspended until this
issue is solved, at least for question concerning this issue :)
Sven, as hard as it currently seems to be for you to not have the last
word on a thread or even a sub-thread, I think you should avoid posting
messages lik
78 matches
Mail list logo
