> Now perhaps I picked DFSG 8 incorrectly. But do you not see how
> onerous this restriction is?
No, I don't. Your scenario seems completely manufactured.
When you look at the logo as its own work, and apply the the DFSG
rules, it may run afoul of the letter of the DFSG, but not the
spirit.
H
> > > In any case, the logo violates DFSG 8, so that trumps the
> > > affordance given by DFSG 4. If I extracted it from Debian and used it
> > > to refer to something else, I would be disallowed from modifying it.
> >
> > Again, that's not how I interpret it. The logo license says the logo ha
2 matches
Mail list logo
