Re: get off your ass

2008-04-26 Thread David Nusinow
uot; I mean actually writing code and not just talking about it or bothering the current developers, who seem to have their hands full already just trying to do the hard work to bring these drivers to fruition. - David Nusinow [0] http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

Re: Update #1 [RFC: Introducing Debian Enhancement Proposals (DEPs)]

2008-01-16 Thread David Nusinow
o it should be > given in the document, and maybe suggest, in the History section, > an URL of the changelog view of the file. How does that sound? Would it be possible to add an RSS feed to the DEP with diffs or the changelog? It'd be nice to be able to track these from a distan

Re: What's needed to integrate backports at full scale

2007-04-15 Thread David Nusinow
uild-deps get very long and it's > not a place where you can use substvars. :-/ It might be easier if we expanded the build-dep field a bit. There could be a build-dep-common, build-dep-unstable, build-dep-stable, etc. That would make it a lot more manageable. - David Nusinow

Re: Debian 4.0 finally arrives... does anyone care?

2007-04-15 Thread David Nusinow
tion out there[1] in the etch timeframe. Vaughan-Nichols is a troll, pure and simple, and we have vastly more positive things to do for ourselves, for our users, and for the community at large than listen to his puffed up sense of entitlement. - David Nusinow [0] An unattributed comment by the way

Re: Debian 4.0 finally arrives... does anyone care?

2007-04-14 Thread David Nusinow
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 09:56:52AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2007 at 08:19:03AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote: > > Yo! > > > > http://www.linux-watch.com/news/NS5673962628.html > > > > Merely somebody who likes Fedora and (Open)SuSE better

Re: Debian 4.0 finally arrives... does anyone care?

2007-04-14 Thread David Nusinow
etch, and we can do more for lenny. I know I've got my plans for the X stuff, and from the TeX and Postgres announcements on -devel-announce, it's clear that others also have big plans. None of the stuff I've got in mind will resolve this problem, but I'm open to suggestions. -

Re: Rethinking stable updates policy

2006-08-30 Thread David Nusinow
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 10:52:15PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > David Nusinow wrote: > >> The rough plan is to provide an alternative set of updated kernel packages > >> and potentially also xservers (depending on how modular the new X.org > >> modulization rea

Re: Rethinking stable updates policy

2006-08-28 Thread David Nusinow
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 10:11:06PM +, David Nusinow wrote: > libs or protocol headers though. The 7.1 server only requires an update of > one lib and two protocol headers from 7.0. I'd imagine that this will be ^^^ Sorry, two libs, although one is mesa. - David Nusin

Re: Rethinking stable updates policy

2006-08-28 Thread David Nusinow
xperience, but the ABI did break between 7.0 and 7.1. The server should work fine without too many additional backports of the libs or protocol headers though. The 7.1 server only requires an update of one lib and two protocol headers from 7.0. I'd imagine that this will be more or less th

Re: Fundamental flaw in bug reporting system

2006-06-29 Thread David Nusinow
ple in #debian had been complaining about this bug, yet no one had submitted it. On the other hand, I got a zillion duplicate bugs about things like manpage sections. If people can't report trivial bugs that need to be fixed, then it makes it hard for us to do what we need to do. I'm not so

Re: irc.debian.org

2006-05-14 Thread David Nusinow
On Sun, May 14, 2006 at 07:55:05PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: < snip lots of stupid crap > Can you please stop diverting a potentially useful thread in to the realm of moronic advocacy? kthxbi - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "

Re: Question And Proposal For All Candidates

2006-03-18 Thread David Nusinow
On Fri, Mar 17, 2006 at 08:24:55AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Thu, 16 Mar 2006, David Nusinow wrote: > > system of governance take over." Fundamentally, this could have happened at > > any time with any of the problematic discussions of the past, but it didn't

Question And Proposal For All Candidates

2006-03-16 Thread David Nusinow
semi-official responsibility would facilitate overcoming the inertia the project has faced in the past? Would you be willing to take on this responsibility as DPL? - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Linux Forums

2006-01-24 Thread David Nusinow
forums for answers to my questions. I think linuxnewbie.org was the best one around at the time (this was the late 90's). Now I'm a proud Debian Developer. Maybe my story isn't and won't be unique. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a s

Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu

2006-01-23 Thread David Nusinow
tle tribe) and I look forward to more of the same. Maybe the next time you start trying to do some real work for Debian rather than troll -project you'll find this out for yourself. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Linux Forums

2006-01-22 Thread David Nusinow
here too. It might not be official, but at least it's got some DD presence currently and it could certainly use more. Fortunately, it's still small enough that it doesn't have to deal with the problems of scale, so I don't know if it'll end up any better than the ubuntu forums

Re: For those who care about debian-devel-announce

2006-01-18 Thread David Nusinow
he majority of the project is absurd. Andrew has pissed off a lot of his fellow developers at many points for many years on issues both technical and social. So please stop trying to paint this as a witch hunt. We've got enough real issues[0] to worry about. - David Nusinow [0] http://bugs.deb

Re: For those who care about their packages in Ubuntu

2006-01-17 Thread David Nusinow
care about a topic please don't waste all of our time while you browbeat your opposition (and in this case, fellow Debian developer) in to the ground. Some of us who do care might want to see something positive come out of this long and painful thread. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: Complaint about #debian operator

2005-12-12 Thread David Nusinow
mplain further about your treatment then I refer you to the deity of your choosing. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Complaint about #debian operator

2005-12-12 Thread David Nusinow
that most of the famed integration going on in Ubuntu is the result of the eye-catching theme, the choice of a single default desktop, and good marketing. I had hoped to install Ubuntu on one of my systems to see for myself, but unfortunately the installer failed so I have had to make do with t

Re: Complaint about #debian operator

2005-12-12 Thread David Nusinow
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 01:59:05PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.12.11.0539 +0100]: > > Martin, I'd like for you to come in to #debian. Not for an hour or > > a few hours, but for a few weeks to see what it's

Re: Complaint about #debian operator

2005-12-10 Thread David Nusinow
r X log file is and those who want to know how to write a patch for the X packages. If you really have our users as your focus, you'll put in the same kind of effort. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Automated testing - design and interfaces

2005-11-18 Thread David Nusinow
easily be > improved. Rather than invent a whole new test harness then, how about integrating the functionality you want in to piuparts? - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Pledge To Killfile Andrew Suffield

2005-08-11 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:09:09PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > I've no grudge against David Nusinow, but rather than > using this expression being parroted around debian, > aimed at various different people, maybe you should take > a really long, hard try at writing a more orig

Re: Pledge To Killfile Andrew Suffield

2005-08-11 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 06:14:51PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 10:19:32AM -0400, David Nusinow wrote: > > You're a smart guy Andrew (definitely smarter than me) > > Now half a dozen people are going to claim I have a superiority > complex, beca

Re: Pledge To Killfile Andrew Suffield

2005-08-11 Thread David Nusinow
ty" or the ravings of people who are out to get you, you'll figure it out. I, for one, hope that you do. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Utnubu Team Founded - Merging Ubuntu changes to Debian

2005-07-16 Thread David Nusinow
> Those who are at DebConf and are interested: You are welcome to see me > and discuss matters in person. > > Thanks for your attention, and looking forward to working with you, Thank you so much for doing this! It's exactly what I've been attempting to do with the X.Org package

Re: Screenshots

2005-07-07 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 12:45:25PM +0200, Benj. Mako Hill wrote: > People like the pretty pictures, it's not difficult for us to do, and > I don't see any reason why we shouldn't. :) Surely, with the zillions of wikis and web photo galleries available in the Debian archive, that some DD isn't will

Re: GFDL freedoms

2005-04-13 Thread David Nusinow
multiple media formats? Which freedoms do they require? Furthermore, why do they require different freedoms? > If you don't agree with their position feel free to shut up. This defeats the purpose of a discussion. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Etch Release Tracking in debbugs (Was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

2005-03-16 Thread David Nusinow
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 03:48:33PM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, David Nusinow wrote: > > The problem with this is that adding a lot of features to the BTS > > while it's in use for etch may not be the wisest move. The last > > thing we need is hav

Re: Etch Release Tracking in debbugs (Was: Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

2005-03-16 Thread David Nusinow
its are that much of the logic is moved in to rails, making it incredibly simple to add things like heirarchy and a relational DB backend. I don't know which approach is better, and for now I'm going to keep hacking on my codebase and see how it goes. > Maybe these thoughts will lead

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

2005-03-14 Thread David Nusinow
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 05:51:58PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-14 12:47]: > > Perhaps you're right. I honestly hadn't considered an etch virtual > > package. My goal has been to automate the process as much as > &

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

2005-03-14 Thread David Nusinow
ly difficult codebase to work with. Then again, if debbugs is sufficient then there's no need for me to do duplicate work, which would be nice. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Tool to track release status (Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting)

2005-03-14 Thread David Nusinow
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 05:25:36PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-03-14 12:20]: > > > And I'd like to suggest the formalization and tracking of these > > > milestones in the etch's release page at Debian site. >

Re: Bits (Nybbles?) from the Vancouver release team meeting

2005-03-14 Thread David Nusinow
ot;it" means. I've begun work on a tool to just that. If anyone is interested in helping develop it, contact me and we can work on setting up an alioth project and such. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Open Letter to Debian Community]

2005-03-11 Thread David Nusinow
ia the mailing lists. You just seem uninformed. How much of that is Debian's fault is debateable. If you really want to help with this issue, you could start to help fix our documentation issues that I mentioned earlier. They could certaintly use a lot of love, and it could be a way to help ot

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Open Letter to Debian Community]

2005-03-11 Thread David Nusinow
more centralized documentation (much like how Gentoo does it) but currently we don't have anyone who's stepped forward to do that work. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Google ads on debian.org

2004-12-13 Thread David Nusinow
n enhance a web site, I thought I'd ask on > -project to see what other people think. At first glance I think this is a very bad idea, but I'd be willing to at least hear what we'd stand to benefit from doing this. As far as I know, we don't need the money, and could probably benefit more from their sponsorship in other ways. - David Nusinow

Re: non-secret discussion on debian-project!

2004-09-23 Thread David Nusinow
--- Jonas Smedegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A wildly interesting discussion is taking place at > debian-project > currently, with the subject "How to solve problem X > least secretly". > > Come on everybody and show the world that you care > about when our secret > mailinglist is appropriat

Re: Debian, lists and discrimination

2004-08-07 Thread David Nusinow
ecent > > description of his entry into Debian), and documentation which could be > > clearer. Is that a good enough start? > > Not it is not. It is not about discrimination, it is about political > correctness in documentation written in English. This is a small part of what -women is trying to accomplish. - David Nusinow [0] http://women.alioth.debian.org/faqs/

Re: GUADEC report

2004-07-11 Thread David Nusinow
vote reflects that this opinion is shared amongst the majority of DD's. I think the idea of questioning mozilla's license, among others, triggers the fear that we will never release because of the constant wrangingling over freeness. The fact that this sort of wrangling is done based on tests (Chinese Dissident, etc) which few are aware of makes the situation worse. - David Nusinow

Re: GUADEC report

2004-07-06 Thread David Nusinow
rate with these people and have actual discussions, not beat them about the head and shoulders with ideology that they probably don't understand. This is the sort of thing that Matthew is reporting about, and it's also the reason for the recent backlash against -legal from within Debian itself. - David Nusinow

Re: Some Comments on Sexism in #debian

2004-03-07 Thread David Nusinow
r there having a difference of > opinion about what we're talking about. It'd be a lot simpler if we both > acknowledged each others point of view, and moved on, but no, we're all > pig-headed twits who won't back down (myself not exempted). It seems like we agree on a lot more things than either of us realized. :-) - David Nusinow

Re: Some Comments on Sexism in #debian

2004-03-07 Thread David Nusinow
respond to my actual point. Are you in favor of double standards? Because that's what the case appears to be for me. - David Nusinow

Re: Some Comments on Sexism in #debian

2004-03-07 Thread David Nusinow
ople get kicked and banned for obvious trolling, crapflooding, and racist remarks. We can and we do control what people say or do, and we can do better. - David Nusinow

Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates

2004-03-05 Thread David Nusinow
noj was talking about "free software coding, and CS overall" in addition to Debian as a whole. The HOWTO you reference also deals with the larger scope as an example. Do try and pay attention. - David Nusinow

Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates

2004-03-05 Thread David Nusinow
s you are > replying to. You replied to Manoj's mail, which was in the context of the larger discussion. In addition to that, the example you cite is in the HOWTO, which is a document written by a number of women who all share this opinion completely outside of the specifics of the Debian proeject. Your advice goes both ways. - David Nusinow

Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates

2004-03-05 Thread David Nusinow
necdote presented was grossly mischaracterised and not an example > of what it claimed to be. There are other anecdotes. See Manoj's mail with the log in it, or the various logs at http://www.p12n.org/misc/sexism/. Compounded evidence certaintly lends weight to a hypothesis. - David Nusinow

Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates

2004-03-05 Thread David Nusinow
ve controls? I'd rather take what information is out there (including my own observations, and observation is the most critical aspect of data gathering) and use it. - David Nusinow

Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates

2004-03-05 Thread David Nusinow
> > coding in general, and CS overall? > > Sunspots. It's at least as convincing. Way to completely ignore the problem, as well as testimonials by those involved. What a productive attitude. - David Nusinow

Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates

2004-03-04 Thread David Nusinow
labs wherever I've been. I've personally had the good fortune to be in labs that were either headed by women or were very friendly to women, but that doesn't mean that I haven't heard stories. You can plug your ears and shout "It's not real!" all you want, but th

Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates

2004-03-04 Thread David Nusinow
yone is interested in setting this up, I think it'd be worthwhile. #debian should still remain a part of the project. - David Nusinow signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Which cds do i really need...

2004-02-29 Thread David Nusinow
downloading knoppix. It's a quick way to try out something that is very close to a Debian system with little fuss. It's a liveCD, which means that you can just boot the computer with the CD in the drive, and it will load a fully functional system. You'll be able to find the iso's linked from www.knoppix.org. - David Nusinow

Re: need your help !

2004-02-27 Thread David Nusinow
ld > be best. I hope you support us. You may also want to be aware of the Debian-Edu project, which has the goal of making Debian more suitable for use in schools. Here is some information on it that you may find interesting: http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianEdu - David Nusinow

Re: Ocrad project - an OCR program

2003-06-15 Thread David Nusinow
to file a Request for Package (RFP) bug for the software you want included, in this case ocrad. You can use the reportbug program to do this easily. For more information, see http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/. - David Nusinow

Re: Why "free" shouldn't have to mean "complicated"

2003-05-05 Thread David Nusinow
On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 08:45:12AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > David Nusinow wrote: > > with the new package tags to make it. apt and aptitude/dselect/other > > frontends still need to be patched to work with sublists of packages in > > order to cut things out like web

Re: Why "free" shouldn't have to mean "complicated"

2003-05-04 Thread David Nusinow
On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 10:19:40AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 02:17:57AM +0200, Felix Steiner wrote: > > But in my opinion free software fails if it is only for geeks. Why not try > > to coordinate development to make an easier installer? Why not bring to > > people what

Re: Debian merchandise.

2003-04-11 Thread David Nusinow
On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 03:21:38PM +0200, Erik Terpstra wrote: > Sorry if this is off-topic on this list, I just subscribed to make the > following suggestion: (please forward to the relevant list if off-topic) > > For some time I have been looking for Debian posters or coffee mugs to > decorate

Re: Why are these packages in Debian?

2003-04-06 Thread David Nusinow
On Sun, Apr 06, 2003 at 10:17:15AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Because somebody packaged them. > > Do you accept any package? Fortunately not! You don't accept any for > technical reasons (for example, in the Debian Weekly News issued February > 18th, 2003, it was considered to remove a