Re: cdimage?? What should we call it?

2015-08-20 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Daniel Sousa writes: > On 19/08/15 23:08, Riley Baird wrote: >>> What about get.debian.org ? (There is get.debian.net) >> Off-topic, but I just had a look at get.debian.net, and it uses Google >> Analytics, which seems strange for a Debian site. > > Also, it's broken. All links return a 404.

Re: Moving to stronger keys than 1024D

2013-10-06 Thread Christoph Egger
Moin! Stefano Zacchiroli writes: >> The more useful question is how many of the signatures on your new key >> come from strong keys, and how many strong keys have you signed with >> that new key? > > Right. If you happen to have a oneliner to verify that I'll be happy to > answer these questions

Re: OpenPGP keysigning: alternate encodings for fingerprint exchange

2013-06-30 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Paul Wise writes: > I think that hexadecimal is a fairly poor pre-encoding for information > exchange via data to speech and speech to data engines (aka voice boxes, > brains and fingers). Reading out and typing long strings of hexadecimal > digits at OpenPGP keysignings is tedious and annoyi

Re: Generation of FOAF profiles for all package maintainers (POC)

2013-02-22 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Olivier Berger writes: > Paul Wise writes: > >> I note that some DDs URLs don't work, for example: >> >> http://webid.debian.net/maintainers/js >> > > Yes, known issue : Jonas uploads with other email addresses, so the > Maintainer fileds on which I'm based (remember it's using the same > sc

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 and 2.5 ?

2013-01-25 Thread Christoph Egger
Charles Plessy writes: > Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:19:23PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit : >> On 01/25/2013 10:41, Charles Plessy wrote: >> > Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:16:24AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : >> >> On 13102 March 1977, Christoph Egger wrote: >&g

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 ?

2013-01-24 Thread Christoph Egger
Charles Plessy writes: > Le Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 08:41:47AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : >> >> When I encounter a work under CC BY 2.0, I have a hard time explaining >> Upstream >> why it is strictly necessary to upgrade it to 2.5 or more for their work to >> be >> distributed in Debian. Wh

Re: Debian training and code review

2010-09-16 Thread Christoph Egger
Hi! Enrico Zini writes: > I'd love it to see it eventually go a step up, like having some review > process by people with especially strong experience, and having them > published by an own blog (à-la debian-administration) where they can be > archived and searched. But that's just one of the man