On February 26, 2020 3:05:22 PM UTC, Charles Plessy wrote:
>
>I sometimes wonder if adding a random delay of 1 to 24 h for every
>message (I mean: rolling the dice again for each message) on -project,
>-devel, -vote and similar lists could help to make us more resilient to
>trolling and at the
On 2/19/20 2:00 PM, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
At the risk of poking a little fun at recent US politics: this _really really_
reads as a /quid pro quo/.
Not really; a quid pro quo there means more than the literal "something
for something". Otherwise going to the grocery store and buying an a
Debian only includes free software, which CC-BY-NC-ND is not. It's also (like
all the Creative Commons licenses) not intended for software.
https://creativecommons.org/faq/#can-i-apply-a-creative-commons-license-to-software
These issues are likely to keep most Linux distros (not just Debian) fro
On 12/05/2017 03:48 PM, Diane Trout wrote:
I would love for files downloaded via a web browser or email client to
be marked as having come from the Internet. (Major bonus points if a
sync tool like nextcloud can keep files I generated labeled separate
from ones my coworkers made)
Chromium (by d
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> The point of the exercise is to avoid having so many organizations and
> so many bank accounts that we would need three professional accountants
> just to keep track. Perhaps I should have worded it as 'no more than one
> such organization shall be active per country'; [...
Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
No. Many applicants simply package stuff no one installs on their
system. And even if some people do, depressingly few people report bugs
they notice - in most cases, they simply remove the package and use
something else.
Well, if no one installs it, it doesn't ma
cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis) wrote:
I agree with a lower limit, but I think it would be better of to specify it
in terms of "certain number of uploads" as opposed to "some time limit":
I might have done 1 upload and just wait a 3 months, or I could have done
several uploads over that same period
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 07:27:26PM +, Helen Faulkner wrote:
> Please note that being an AM is a very important and responsible job.
> Please treat your applicants in a nice and friendly manner. If you have
> any questions about how to proceed with an applicant, please don't
> hesitate to cont
On Wednesday, Aug 13, 2003, at 03:17 US/Eastern, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 07:51:56PM -0400, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Because this isn't the forum for discussing the removal of non-free?
And
because the discussion about removing non-free has to wait until the
shel
9 matches
Mail list logo
