Jonas Smedegaard writes:
> Any opinion on the "votes twice" part? Anyone?
How many decisions have we had that were decided by a slim enough margin
that you believe fraud could have changed the outcome?
What have we voted on that you think anyone would care sufficiently about
to do the tedious a
Quoting Philip Hands (2020-08-20 10:05:42)
> rhkra...@gmail.com writes:
>
> > On Wednesday, August 19, 2020 09:33:04 AM Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >> If the term "malicious DD" is reasonable, we have a bigger problem
> >> than "votes twice" or "uploads a backdoor".
> >>
> >> aka, "a malicious DD e
On Thu, 2020-08-20 at 10:05 +0200, Philip Hands wrote:
> Conjuring up a "mallicious DD" seems to carry with it the assumption
> that only bad people do bad things, which seems naive to me.
>
> This conversation reminds me of the trade-offs involved in airport
> security.
>
> One can decide to spe
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 10:05:42AM +0200, Philip Hands wrote:
> If I were a sociopath contemplating sabotage in the Free Software
> sphere, going to the effort of becoming a DD, even for the first time,
> would be nowhere near the top of my list.
Indeed, I would sabotage some upstream code directly
rhkra...@gmail.com writes:
> On Wednesday, August 19, 2020 09:33:04 AM Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> If the term "malicious DD" is reasonable, we have a bigger problem than
>> "votes twice" or "uploads a backdoor".
>>
>> aka, "a malicious DD exists" is already a problem.
>
> Do you have a suggested s
5 matches
Mail list logo
