On Wednesday, August 19, 2020 09:33:04 AM Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> If the term "malicious DD" is reasonable, we have a bigger problem than
> "votes twice" or "uploads a backdoor".
>
> aka, "a malicious DD exists" is already a problem.
Do you have a suggested solution?
I believe there are circums
On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 08:39:02PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Federico Ceratto (2020-08-17 20:17:49)
> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 5:40 PM Roberto C. Sánchez
> > wrote:
> > > Perhaps instead of requiring "a valid DD signature" as the basis for
> > > "important" project actions (e.g., u
2 matches
Mail list logo
