> "Norbert" == Norbert Preining writes:
Norbert> Hi Sam, surprising statements from you ...
Norbert> On Wed, 22 May 2019, Sam Hartman wrote:
>> The same is true of package maintainership though. We sometimes
>> do change the maintainership because we're unhappy with how
> "Mathias" == Mathias Behrle writes:
Mathias> * Karsten Merker: " Re: Question for Planet Admins: What
Mathias> Should I do if another Developer Removes my Blog" (Sat, 25
Mathias> May 2019 17:49:13 +0200):
Mathias> Hi together,
Mathias> I am supporting wholeheartedly th
Hi Sam,
surprising statements from you ...
On Wed, 22 May 2019, Sam Hartman wrote:
> The same is true of package maintainership though. We sometimes do
> change the maintainership because we're unhappy with how someone
> maintains their packages. That rarely uses the formal policy that goes
??
On May 25, 2019 9:16:09 PM UTC, Holger Levsen wrote:
>On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 05:49:13PM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
>> b) The only case where I would consider a forced removal of
>>somebody else's feed by somebody who is not part of planet
>>admin to be justified would be if the furth
Quoting Sam Hartman (2019-05-25 20:12:26)
> > "Jonas" == Jonas Smedegaard writes:
>
> Jonas> I also run Asterisk at a few small networks, and experienced
> Jonas> similar failure connecting with rtc.d.o in the past - but I
> Jonas> didn't try very hard back then.
>
> Jonas> I sincerely hope
On Sat, May 25, 2019 at 05:49:13PM +0200, Karsten Merker wrote:
> b) The only case where I would consider a forced removal of
>somebody else's feed by somebody who is not part of planet
>admin to be justified would be if the further inclusion of the
>feed on planet would constitute a cr
* Karsten Merker: " Re: Question for Planet Admins: What Should I do if another
Developer Removes my Blog" (Sat, 25 May 2019 17:49:13 +0200):
Hi together,
I am supporting wholeheartedly the view of Carsten with some small amendments.
> a) As the general rule DDs who are not part of planet admi
> "Jonas" == Jonas Smedegaard writes:
Jonas> I also run Asterisk at a few small networks, and experienced
Jonas> similar failure connecting with rtc.d.o in the past - but I
Jonas> didn't try very hard back then.
Jonas> I sincerely hope these renewed efforts can help improve
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 929516 mirrors
Bug #929516 [project] [project] Please provide onion services using next-gen
(v3) onion addresses
Bug reassigned from package 'project' to 'mirrors'.
No longer marked as found in versions current.
Ignoring request to alter
Package: project
Version: current
adresses
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
Some time ago the tor project introduced 56 character long, next-gen
(v3) onion addresses, which also utilize stronger cryptography.
However, Debian is still using v2 onion addresses for it
Hi Wouter,
Quoting Wouter Verhelst (2019-05-12 00:32:56)
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 05:13:10PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > I have tried but failed at using the service.
>
> Same here.
>
> Unfortunately, my experience with rtc.d.o have been less than stellar:
>
> - The Jabber service is a
11 matches
Mail list logo
