Well, this conversation that is very important and relevant for me,
reaches me in a bad moment. So expuse my slow replies, please.
On 18/04/18 17:17, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Lars Wirzenius writes ("Re: Conflict escalation and discipline"):
>> "Debian emotional support group", maybe.
>
> I find this
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:46:03PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> If there would be one clear rule, I´d say: Never ever attack a person.
> Harmlessness with each other goes a long, long way.
>
> Wrongdoing someone who probably did something that did not serve the
> project or another person
Alvaro Herrera writes ("Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI
heads-up"):
> Ian Jackson wrote:
> > There's one bugfix: "the the" should read "the".
>
> No bugfix for "anticpate" or "predjudice"?
Thanks for the proofreading :-). I have run it through a spillchucker
too.
> (I also wond
Ian Jackson wrote:
> That's right. For your convenience my mail
> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:53:34 +0100
> quoted the thing again.
> There's one bugfix: "the the" should read "the".
No bugfix for "anticpate" or "predjudice"?
(I also wonder about "Nor do ... do so on Debian's behalf". Looks od
Ian,
> > Thanks for running with this. I am happy with the content and with
> > your name at the bottom.
> >
> > (Happy to sign it too if that's needed or helpful for whatever
> > reason.)
>
> It might make it more convincing if you were to sign it, indeed.
It's likely to save a pointless round
* Ian Jackson [2018-04-19 16:38]:
> > Just to make sure we're on the same page, you're talking about the
> > draft letter you posted 31 Aug 2017 15:19:18. There have been no
> > changes since that post, right?
>
> That's right. For your convenience my mail
> Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:53:34 +0
Martin Michlmayr writes ("Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI
heads-up"):
> Ian Jackson [2018-04-19 13:53]:
> > SPI: are you willing to have the SPI Secretary sign this letter ? If
>
> Just to make sure we're on the same page, you're talking about the
> draft letter you posted 31 Au
* Ian Jackson [2018-04-19 13:53]:
> SPI: are you willing to have the SPI Secretary sign this letter ? If
Just to make sure we're on the same page, you're talking about the
draft letter you posted 31 Aug 2017 15:19:18. There have been no
changes since that post, right?
> not, who should we ask
Colin Watson - 19.04.18, 01:42:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:28:44PM +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > Did I get this right that you think that a person can be a problem
> > that possibly would have to be removed from the project?
> >
> > If so I heavily disagree with that.
>
> It's an action
Chris Lamb writes ("Re: Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up"):
> Hi Ian,
> > Chris, are you now content ? Would you be happy with me putting
> > my name on the bottom ofthis letter ?
>
> Thanks for running with this. I am happy with the content and with
> your name at the bottom.
Hi Ian,
> Chris, are you now content ? Would you be happy with me putting
> my name on the bottom ofthis letter ?
Thanks for running with this. I am happy with the content and with
your name at the bottom.
(Happy to sign it too if that's needed or helpful for whatever
reason.)
Best wishes,
-
Ian Jackson writes ("Debian trademark, EAN, proposed letter, SPI heads-up"):
> We (Debian, me specifically) are about to ask Free Software
> Conservancy for legal advice - specifically whether there is anything
> wrong with this proposed letter.
I am picking this up again now after a long delay.
MENGUAL Jean-Philippe writes ("Re: Request for official help"):
> Did I miss something about this topic? Any news?
I'm sorry, I dropped this. Please do hassle me if you don't hear more
in the next week.
Ian.
Dear fellow developers,
> > That's certainly true. I thought of these ideas:
>
> What about [..]
I would agree that the current name for the Anti-Harrassment team
is sub-optimal and that names & words are uniquely powerful tools
at our disposal.
I can think of many historical examples in Debia
On 15011 March 1977, Ian Jackson wrote:
> * Where appropriate, recommend action to: DAM, TC, listmaster, IRC
>operators, DPL. Information about the situation would be provided
>by the disputes team to the gatekeeper team; but the gatekeeper
>team would not be expected to make its own
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > This implies to me that, at the least, "anti-harassment" is the wrong
> > name for a team that deals with this.
>
> That's certainly true. I thought of these ideas:
What about def...@debian.org ?
You write to them when you are about to explode and nee
16 matches
Mail list logo
