On May 11 2017, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Nikolaus Rath writes:
>> On May 10 2017, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
>>> and no conclusions should ever be drawn from it?
>
>> I don't think anyone has said that.
>
> Quoting from the originally proposed wiki page:
>
> | The following people have added themselves
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud writes ("Re: Debian contributor Register of Interests"):
> That said, I still think that there are situations in which declaring one's
> conflicts of interest _does_ matter, but I do expect the affected individual
> to
> either explcitly retract (or stay away) from the discu
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:10:39PM +0200, Philip Hands wrote:
> Also, I suspect that anyone that might be tempted to misbehave as a
> result of CoI will not have filled in their entry anyway, which makes me
> wonder what useful purpose this could serve beyond a virtue signalling
> opportunity.
I u
Le mardi, 9 mai 2017, 09.16:21 h CEST Jonathan Dowland a écrit :
> However in the interests of transparency I feel that a voluntary, opt-in
> "Register of Interests" is a good idea for the project. I feel that such a
> list (populated) would demonstrate the transparency and openness that are
> part
4 matches
Mail list logo
