On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 15:46 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> There is a recent case where:
> * The maintainer has done nothing to the package for many years,
> other than infrequent (and usually short) emails to NAK
> contributions from others;
> * Several times, proposed updates have been prepa
Senador Navarro - Boletín de noticias
@media only screen and (max-width: 550px), screen = and
(max-device-width: 550px) { body[yahoo] .hide { display: none }
body[yahoo] .buttonwrapper { background-color: transparent }
body[yahoo] .button { padding: 0 } body[yahoo] .button a {
background-c
* Adam Borowski [161206 10:10]:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:18:49AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > What I currently find inconvenient about the LowThresholdNmu page is, that
> > it
> > is external to the source package. So after having found a package I want to
> > fix I have to manually loo
Lars Wirzenius writes ("Re: Formal declaration of weak package ownership in
source packages (was: Replace the TC power to depose maintainers)"):
> For example, there's corner cases that get tricky. A package might
> only be in stable, but the maintainer wants to declare it as
> LowThresholdAdoptab
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 04:15:22PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> why would it be important to change that kind of information for a package in
> stable? The audience interested in this field is interested in uploads to
> unstable, so is it not sufficient if the information is up-to-date there?
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 04:15:22PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> why would it be important to change that kind of information for a package in
> stable? The audience interested in this field is interested in uploads to
> unstable, so is it not sufficient if the information is up-to-date there?
Hi,
Quoting Lars Wirzenius (2016-12-06 16:06:30)
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 03:50:12PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > Actually, this is a great argument for why this information should be in a
> > deb822 field in the source package itself.
>
> FWIW, I think this is the kind of information that
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 03:50:12PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Actually, this is a great argument for why this information should be in a
> deb822 field in the source package itself.
FWIW, I think this is the kind of information that should be kept out
of the source package, since changing it
Hi,
Quoting Holger Levsen (2016-12-06 15:15:53)
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 03:08:54PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/multistrap
> > I see that https://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu lists you as
> > [[JohannesSchauer|Johannes 'josch' Schauer]] while the maintainer
Stefano Zacchiroli writes ("Re: Replace the TC power to depose maintainers"):
> We should go for "weak code ownership" instead,
I was thinking about what Scott wrote, and also went back and read
some of the bug log he is referring to. I wonder if there is an
underlying a useful observation about
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 03:08:54PM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/multistrap
> I see that https://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu lists you as
> [[JohannesSchauer|Johannes 'josch' Schauer]] while the maintainer field is
> Johannes Schauer , that obviously breaks a st
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 02:55:57PM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Quoting Adam Borowski (2016-12-06 09:36:08)
> > On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:18:49AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > > What I currently find inconvenient about the LowThresholdNmu page is,
> > > that it
> > > is external to the s
Scott Kitterman writes ("Re: Replace the TC power to depose maintainers"):
> Having been involved in one of these things even as a maintainer of
> a package that was not directly the target of the request to the TC
> was extremely trying. [etc.]
Thanks for sharing your experience. I know that's
Hi,
Quoting Adam Borowski (2016-12-06 09:36:08)
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:18:49AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> > What I currently find inconvenient about the LowThresholdNmu page is, that
> > it
> > is external to the source package. So after having found a package I want to
> > fix I have
Johannes Schauer writes ("Formal declaration of weak package ownership in
source packages (was: Replace the TC power to depose maintainers)"):
> I think the thread has derailed here a little bit but I think that
> Lars and Tollef are aware that their proposals are orthogonal to the
> problem you b
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:18:49AM +0100, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> What I currently find inconvenient about the LowThresholdNmu page is, that it
> is external to the source package. So after having found a package I want to
> fix I have to manually look up on that wiki page whether the maintainer
Hi,
Quoting Ian Jackson (2016-12-05 23:04:48)
> Tollef Fog Heen writes ("Re: Replace the TC power to depose maintainers [and
> 1 more messages]"):
> > A similar proposal: Have a way of declaring the package to be under
> > collective maintenance (put it under collab-maint on alioth +
> > Maintain
17 matches
Mail list logo
