Re: call for help: partners program

2015-03-15 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 15/03/15 at 14:51 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > Sorry for bringing up > https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2015/03/msg00020.html > earlier today without having seen this message last month. > > > also sprach Lucas Nussbaum [2015-02-17 14:02 +0100]: > > I would like to build a small gro

from: Brittster12

2015-03-15 Thread Brittster12
Hey http://info.wolford.com/picture.php?section=67nzse8kke6q brittste...@aol.com Sent from my iPhone -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/adee1e3d-

Re: call for help: partners program

2015-03-15 Thread martin f krafft
Sorry for bringing up https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2015/03/msg00020.html earlier today without having seen this message last month. also sprach Lucas Nussbaum [2015-02-17 14:02 +0100]: > I would like to build a small group of people in charge of this program. Count me in. > Ideally,

Re: On Debian not using its money (was: Q to all candidates: SWOT analysis)

2015-03-15 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Lucas Nussbaum [2015-03-15 13:29 +0100]: > Wasn't it addressed in > https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2015/02/msg00070.html ? I am sorry, I have not been following every mail lately. Yes, this looks spot-on. I'll reply there. -- .''`. martin f. krafft @martinkrafft : :' :

Re: On Debian not using its money (was: Q to all candidates: SWOT analysis)

2015-03-15 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 15/03/15 at 13:05 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Lucas Nussbaum [2015-03-15 12:40 +0100]: > > I agree that it should be possible to improve on identifying a > > recurring, plannable, dependable income. But there hasn't been much > > response to requests for help in the related area

Re: On Debian not using its money (was: Q to all candidates: SWOT analysis)

2015-03-15 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Lucas Nussbaum [2015-03-15 12:40 +0100]: > I agree that it should be possible to improve on identifying a > recurring, plannable, dependable income. But there hasn't been much > response to requests for help in the related areas. For example, I only > got one answer to the call for hel

Re: On Debian not using its money (was: Q to all candidates: SWOT analysis)

2015-03-15 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 15/03/15 at 11:28 +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > Our problem wrt money is IMHO that we don't have cash flow, i.e. > recurring, plannable, dependable income, which can be allocated to > budgets and necessary expenses, bypassing the substance which then > only serves as our backup. > > The subst

On Debian not using its money (was: Q to all candidates: SWOT analysis)

2015-03-15 Thread martin f krafft
[I've moved this over to debian-project and only bcc'd debian-vote] The post I am replying to is https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2015/03/msg00033.html (and https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2015/03/msg00031.html), but there's a sibling discussion going on at https://lists.debian.org/debian