Daniel Pocock writes:
> On 28/08/14 08:16, Chris Bannister wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 06:05:55PM +0200, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>>>"JSHint is open source and will always stay this way."[2]
>>>
>>>"To be honest, I'm getting tired of these not-true-open-source talks.
>>> Out of all thin
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 07:51:06PM +, Archuleta, John A wrote:
> We have a Silicon Mechanics Server with Debian OS that we are shipping
> to Brazil for a climate experiment. Do you have an Export Control
> Classification Number (ECCN) for your OS so we can get export
> documents issued by our c
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Archuleta, John A wrote:
> ECCN
https://wiki.debian.org/USExportControl might be your best bet
Cheers,
Paul
--
:wq
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian
On 2014-09-04 17:40, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> In conclusion, I think we should stop building administrative procedures
> to enforce the CoC but start integrating it as a part of our collective
> and individual responsibilities as Debian events attendees; there's
> antiharassment@ for the up
We have a Silicon Mechanics Server with Debian OS that we are shipping to
Brazil for a climate experiment. Do you have an Export Control Classification
Number (ECCN) for your OS so we can get export documents issued by our company.
Thanks-John
Chris Bannister writes ("Re: [Debconf-discuss] Code of Conduct violations
handling process"):
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 01:13:23PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > If a CoC complaint is made, and the decisionmakers consider the
> > complaint unjustified, the complaint should not be referred elsewhere
- "Ean Schuessler" wrote:
> I'm saying it *does* do that but I am saying that we can't ever
> allow it to.
Oops. Should read "I'm not saying it *does* do that...". Sorry.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
also sprach Ian Jackson [2014-09-04 05:15
-0700]:
> I am not angry or upset with the performance of Debconf organisers
> or the antiharassment team. Rather, I feel that they were not
> provided with the tools and support required to do their job.
Right, and we are also new to this. We should no
Hi all,
Le mercredi, 3 septembre 2014, 18.55:04 Ian Jackson a écrit :
> I hope that regardless of your opinions about the specific incident,
> you would support the ideas that:
>
> - If we have a CoC it should be enforced.
(Snipped a lot of administrativia suggestions.)
"To enforce" is the wro
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 06:31:59PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Neil Gaiman writes:
>
> I was reading a book (about interjections, oddly enough) yesterday
> which included the phrase `In these days of political correctness...'
> talking about no longer making jokes that denigrated people for
On Thursday, September 04, 2014 09:57:27 Ean Schuessler wrote:
> - "Russ Allbery" wrote:
> > At least in the United States, people who use the term "political
> > correctness" in all seriousness as something they dislike and think is
> > bad are generally people with whom you would not want to
- "Russ Allbery" wrote:
> At least in the United States, people who use the term "political
> correctness" in all seriousness as something they dislike and think is
> bad are generally people with whom you would not want to share a project
> and people who you would be best off avoiding. Thi
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 01:13:23PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
>
> If a CoC complaint is made, and the decisionmakers consider the
> complaint unjustified, the complaint should not be referred elsewhere
> or escalated. Instead, the decision (complaint considered not
> justified, no action will be t
martin f krafft writes ("Re: [Debconf-discuss] Code of Conduct violations
handling process"):
> also sprach Patty Langasek [2014-09-03 16:57 -0700]:
> > The way this particular Code of Conduct Violation Complaint was
> > handled was entirely my fault.
>
> I don't think there is any point in thin
Steve Langasek writes ("Re: [Debconf-discuss] Code of Conduct violations
handling process"):
> In the particular incident prompting this thread, [...]
I started writing a response to this. But I found that my response,
no matter how carefully phrased, read like an attack on the people who
dealt
I have tried not to reply to this, but there's some bits in here I don't
think should go unchallenged, but I'll stick to the major points rather
than replying to each comment.
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 09:15:33AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On 9/4/14, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I'm offended at
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It's also possible that, as a matter of course, we should ensure that the
> antiharassment team responds timely in writing to all complaints, even if
> there is an out-of-band follow-up.
Following up in the same media used for a complaint i
On 2014-09-04 07:28, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04 2014, Christian Kastner wrote:
>
>> On 2014-09-04 01:34, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 03 2014, Steve Langasek wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 09:52:44AM -0700, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> People associa
18 matches
Mail list logo
