On 5/26/14, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Michael Gilbert writes:
>> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
>>> We could combine both features, though: set a term length of two years,
>>> and then say that people can serve for two terms in succession but then
>>> have to leave the committ
On 5/26/14, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
>> Which is more important, avoiding sudden upheavals where possible,
>> or ensuring individual ctte members have breaks?
>
>> If the latter's more important, then it's better not to special case
>> things now; if the former's more importa
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>>> We could combine both features, though: set a term length of two years,
>>> and then say that people can serve for two terms in succession but then
>>> have to leave the committee for at least one term.
>
>> 8 seems like it would be near idea
Michael Gilbert writes:
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> We could combine both features, though: set a term length of two years,
>> and then say that people can serve for two terms in succession but then
>> have to leave the committee for at least one term.
> 8 seems lik
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> We could combine both features, though: set a term length of two years,
> and then say that people can serve for two terms in succession but then
> have to leave the committee for at least one term.
8 seems like it would be near ideal: turnove
Anthony Towns writes:
> Hmm, that doesn't really get to the point I was trying to reach. How
> about:
> Which is more important, avoiding sudden upheavals where possible,
> or ensuring individual ctte members have breaks?
> If the latter's more important, then it's better not to special case
* Colin Watson:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 08:31:11AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Furthermore, we need to store the keys for all EV certificates (both
>> the certificate used for submission, and the certificate embedded in
>> the shim) in devices that meet at least FIPS 140 Level 2. Such
>> de
On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 11:37:53AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Yeah; I don't think that's a bad rule in general, but I'm not convinced
> > it's a great fit for the tech-ctte. The thought experiment that makes me
> > doubt it is "if a compulsory x year break after n years of service makes
> > sen
8 matches
Mail list logo
