On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 06:37:41PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:59:42AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > ==
> > 1. The Debian project decides to accept a code of conduct for
> >participants to its mailinglists, IRC channels, and other modes of
> >communication
Peter Samuelson writes:
> [Jonathan Dowland]
>> I think the increasing importance of IRC for people to keep up to date
>> on developments in Debian is a bad thing as it excludes people who
>> cannot use IRC regularly enough (such as myself).
> Increasing importance? What has changed? I don't h
[Jonathan Dowland]
> I think the increasing importance of IRC for people to keep up to
> date on developments in Debian is a bad thing as it excludes people
> who cannot use IRC regularly enough (such as myself).
Increasing importance? What has changed? I don't have the impression
that IRC is a
On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 06:33:44PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:59:42AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This is to propose a general resolution under §4.1.5 of the constitution
> > to propose a Debian code of conduct.
>
> So I've put up a vote page with
John Goerzen writes:
> Because, at the end of the day, it doesn't really matter all that much. It's
> just a default.
I can only agree about the init system. The best supported system
will make it's way to the default anyway, sooner or later.
But the discussion is not about the default init syst
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:59:42AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> ==
> 1. The Debian project decides to accept a code of conduct for
>participants to its mailinglists, IRC channels, and other modes of
>communication within the project.
So I've been wondering under which part of the co
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:59:42AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is to propose a general resolution under §4.1.5 of the constitution
> to propose a Debian code of conduct.
So I've put up a vote page with my current understanding at:
https://www.debian.org/vote/2014/vote_002
I'
Dear folks,
I wise man once told me, years ago, that he had unsubscribed from
debian-devel because of all the noise. I had thought that rather odd at
the time, but have come to appreciate it since.
Like many, I have my opinion in the init system (my choice: sysvinit -
it ain't broke, and I alrea
Hi,
Thibaut Paumard writes:
> I am still waiting for your answer to my concerns before I make my mind
> on seconding this GR:
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2014/03/msg00024.html
>
> The problem, I think, is that the discussion was drawn onto procedural
> technicalities rather than d
Thibaut Paumard writes ("Re: Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of init
systems"):
> I wonder whether this GR has the following corollary:
As the author of the TC text (which Matthew has simply adopted), I
think I can clarify this. What I'm about to say will come as no
surprise to anyone who
Cyril Brulebois writes ("Re: GR proposal: code of conduct"):
> Kurt Roeckx (2014-03-06):
> > As far as I can tell the problem is that you're not using MIME and
> > the same problem people have when voting using non-ASCII
> > characters.
>
> Conveniently published not so long ago:
> http://debia
Le 07/03/2014 10:52, Matthew Vernon a écrit :
>> I wish to propose the following general resolution,
> This has only had one second.
Dear Matthew,
I am still waiting for your answer to my concerns before I make my mind
on seconding this GR:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2014/03/msg0002
Hi,
Matthew Vernon writes:
> I wish to propose the following general resolution, and hereby call
> for seconds. I don't think further lengthy discussion of the issues is
This has only had one second. In order to not prolong things
indefinitely, I'll withdraw this GR if it's not got sufficient
13 matches
Mail list logo
