Re: Honestly, fork systemd

2014-02-16 Thread Aigars Mahinovs
On 16 February 2014 14:34, wrote: > The alternative is allready here. It's called SysV. Nothing needs to be > done. > It is a rock on which to build. > Not a shifting sands. If you insist on alegories, then the choice now stands between building on a solitary rock in the middle of a stormy sea o

Re: Honestly, fork systemd

2014-02-16 Thread redlynx
The alternative is allready here. It's called SysV. Nothing needs to be done. It is a rock on which to build. Not a shifting sands. I must say, I agree with the man of the New Testament on this particular sort of issue. Build your house on rock, not on sand. The alternative is allready in all of

Re: Honestly, fork systemd

2014-02-16 Thread Daniel Pocock
On 16/02/14 09:54, ChaosEsque Team wrote: > Isn't it great that we have to have this discussion about forking debian > because within an oligarchic 8 man planning committee, which > was split 50/50 for and against systemd, the chairman happened to > be a systemd fan and abused his position to gai