On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 21:39:47 Russ Allbery wrote:
> Chris Knadle writes:
> > On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 16:27:52 Russ Allbery wrote:
> >> Ean Schuessler writes:
> >>> I am actually for the CoC. My complaint is that the GR does not
> >>> require a record keeping process. I actually
Chris Knadle writes:
> On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 16:27:52 Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Ean Schuessler writes:
>>> I am actually for the CoC. My complaint is that the GR does not
>>> require a record keeping process. I actually agree with Steve that we
>>> should not be concerned about publicly a
On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 16:27:52 Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ean Schuessler writes:
> > I am actually for the CoC. My complaint is that the GR does not require
> > a record keeping process. I actually agree with Steve that we should not
> > be concerned about publicly advertising the bans. A ban
Ean Schuessler writes:
> I am actually for the CoC. My complaint is that the GR does not require
> a record keeping process. I actually agree with Steve that we should not
> be concerned about publicly advertising the bans. A ban should have been
> proceeded by a warning and should be reasonable
- "Ian Jackson" wrote:
> This isn't really true IMO. Someone who is banned can always send a
> message privately to a sympathetic contributor, who can forward it if
> it seems relevant or interesting. (I have in fact done this for a
> contributor who was under some kind of cloud, when they
Ean Schuessler writes ("Re: GR proposal: code of conduct"):
> I feel we must see clearly that the CoC and its related ban punishment
> effectively amounts to a nascent "court system" for the project.
I don't think that's the case and I don't want to see it that way.
> A comprehensive ban is eff
First of all I apologize if this is not the right place to ask, but to a
newcomer all the Debian lists can be a bit confusing and I was not able to
find a more relevant list.
I am a master student at the IT University of Copenhagen and I am writing
my final thesis on contributors to Free and Open
On Wednesday, February 12, 2014 11:45:05 Ean Schuessler wrote:
> - "Wouter Verhelst" wrote:
> > # Debian Code of Conduct
>
> ...
>
> > ## In case of problems
> >
> > Serious or persistent offenders will be temporarily or permanently
> > banned from communicating through Debian's systems. Co
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 06:25:12PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 11:59 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> [...]
> > ## Assume good faith
> >
> > Debian Contributors have many ways of reaching our common goal of a
> > [free](http://www.debian.org/intro/free) operating system whic
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:45:05AM -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> I hope many of you will agree that while the CoC may be a necessary
> feature for our community it should be governed in a transparent,
> policy-driven and unbiased manner with detailed record keeping and
> peer review.
I agree with
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Ean Schuessler wrote:
> It is well understood that secret laws and secret courts are not a
> desirable feature for any government. I feel that the same should hold
> true for our community. The procedures leading up to a ban, the
> evidence collected, the criteria the evidence
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 11:59 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
[...]
> ## Assume good faith
>
> Debian Contributors have many ways of reaching our common goal of a
> [free](http://www.debian.org/intro/free) operating system which may
> differ from your ways. Assume that other people are working towards
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 11:45 -0600, Ean Schuessler wrote:
>
> It is well understood that secret laws and secret courts are not a
> desirable feature for any government. I feel that the same should
> hold true for our community. The procedures leading up to a ban, the
> evidence collected, the crit
- "Wouter Verhelst" wrote:
> # Debian Code of Conduct
...
> ## In case of problems
>
> Serious or persistent offenders will be temporarily or permanently
> banned from communicating through Debian's systems. Complaints should
> be made (in private) to the administrators of the Debian commun
On 10/02/2014 17:26, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> http://www.itwire.com
snip
> Not really objective journalism
The byline alone is enough to deduce this. Let's not feed the trolls.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact li
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 10:42:14AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I personally would defer to the Debian press team to decide whether they
> feel we should make a public statement at this time. I think we're still
> in the middle of our process, which I understand that a lot of people
> outside the
Hi all,
This is to propose a general resolution under ยง4.1.5 of the constitution
to propose a Debian code of conduct.
This code of conduct has been drafted during debconf, and been refined
during a BoF session there and in a discussion on the debian-project
mailinglist. For more details, please s
17 matches
Mail list logo
