Re: Documentation of the Dpkg triggers in the Policy (please).

2014-01-17 Thread Russ Allbery
Charles Plessy writes: > In the absence of help from other Developers, could for instance one of > the four Policy editors, who were recently delegated and therefore > re-stated their interest in editing the Policy, do something about it ? It has been on my to-do list for nearly a year to look a

Documentation of the Dpkg triggers in the Policy (please).

2014-01-17 Thread Charles Plessy
Hi Guillem, regarding the Dpkg triggers (#582109), could you find some time to have a look? Alternatively, do you agree that other developers are encouraged at looking by themselves and second the patch, that is, that the integration of the Dpkg triggers in the Policy can go without your review ?

Re: Google contacting (harassing?) new DDs

2014-01-17 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
On 10.12.2013 21:51, Enrico Tassi wrote: My personal experience is that if you talk with them, and tell them you are not interested now but you maybe in $n years, then they stop harrassing you for exactly $n years. I.e. they are not spammers, they pass the Turing test, but they can't read you

Re: Evaluation criterias for (prospective) Trusted Organizations

2014-01-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 17/01/14 at 12:47 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > So, first things first, I would welcome your feedback on the TO > > criterias[1]. Soft deadline: 2014-02-01. > > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DPL/TrustedOrganizationCriteria > > I didn

Re: Evaluation criterias for (prospective) Trusted Organizations

2014-01-17 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Fri, 17 Jan 2014, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > So, first things first, I would welcome your feedback on the TO > criterias[1]. Soft deadline: 2014-02-01. > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DPL/TrustedOrganizationCriteria I didn't find anything really problematic in the criteria, at least not w

Re: Evaluation criterias for (prospective) Trusted Organizations

2014-01-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 17/01/14 at 11:13 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > With auditors and DPL helpers, we worked on a list of evaluation > criterias for prospective Trusted Organizations[1]. ^ (and now, I remember that 'criteria' is plural. Please s/criterias/criteria/ everywhere ...) Lucas -- To UNSUB

Evaluation criterias for (prospective) Trusted Organizations

2014-01-17 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
TL;DR: let's try to implement Constitution 5.1.11 and 9.3: discuss status of prospective TOs, accept them, have an official list of them. Hi, Our Constitution says: (5.1.11) The project leader may: Add or remove organizations from the list of trusted organizations (see ยง9.3) that are au