On Thu, 21 Nov 2013 07:43:32 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Eliseu Cendron Carvalho wrote:
> > So, is there any chance to make Choqok 1.4 available on Debian
> > Wheezy repos?
> Please file a release-critical bug (severity serious) about this issue.
I guess that's #712
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Eliseu Cendron Carvalho wrote:
> So, is there any chance to make Choqok 1.4 available on Debian Wheezy repos?
Please file a release-critical bug (severity serious) about this issue.
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
If the maintainer doesn't respond quickly t
]] anarcat
> On 2013-11-14 10:37:21, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > Yes. If you're just anycasting an IP, you'll get pretty poor
> > performance.
>
> Can you expand on that?
BGP anycast will just get you the closest one in term of metrics. This
is probably the fewest number of cheapest hops. Th
I use Debian Wheezy and I installed the Choqok Twitter client version
1.3 (this one: http://packages.debian.org/wheezy/choqok), but it's not
suported by Twitter anymore, because it's still using the now-obsolete
Twitter API 1.0. Choqok 1.4 uses API 1.1, but it's available in Debian
Testing and
On Wed, November 20, 2013 19:03, anarcat wrote
>>> And saying that "because there's proprietary firmware in your BIOS it's
>>> okay to offload all of Debian's infrastructure to a non-free CDN is
>>> okay"
>>> seems to me to be a slippery slope.
>>
>> Nobody has talked about moving all of Debian's i
On 2013-11-14 10:37:21, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> ]] anarcat
>
>> On 2013-11-14 05:20:12, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> > ]] anarcat
> I'm not aware of any open source 40GE PHYs for instance? Most of what
> I've seen done is around SDN, which is all nice and good, but doesn't
> actually make the PHY
6 matches
Mail list logo
