Op 05-11-13 19:53, Ian Jackson schreef:
> Wouter Verhelst writes ("Re: Result of the Code of Conduct BOF at Debconf
> [and 1 more messages]"):
>> Op 15-08-13 11:48, Ian Jackson schreef:
>>> I think the existing draft is far too long. I'd like to propose
>>> something much shorter:
>
>>> Debi
Op 05-11-13 19:47, Ian Jackson schreef:
> Wouter Verhelst writes ("Code of Conduct: picking up"):
>> Anyway. The story so far:
>> - I posted a draft update of the code of conduct to this list in may[1],
>> upon which a short discussion was started
>> - It was suggested that the draft wasn't ambit
Hi,
My name is Shana Bastemeyer with Altitude Digital. We’ve reached out to you
previously and I’m following up again because we still have huge demand for
display and video ad inventory for Q4 (and beyond) and we’re looking for
some new supply partners.
We also have a turnkey video product t
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 08:07:33PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> Can we produce a minimal netinst which does just this
> for a default install and adds desktop selection
> for an expert install.
How does the current netinst not qualify? You have to select
Desktop Environment on the tasksel scr
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 03:50:59PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 15:42:13 +0100, Stefan Mauerberger wrote:
>
> > Hi There!
> >
> > Just wanted to let you know that from my point of view it is a very bad
> > call changing Debian's default desktop once more. (... GNOME2 -> GNOME3
> >
Wouter Verhelst writes ("Re: Result of the Code of Conduct BOF at Debconf [and
1 more messages]"):
> Op 15-08-13 11:48, Ian Jackson schreef:
> > I think the existing draft is far too long. I'd like to propose
> > something much shorter:
...
> > Debian code of conduct
> > --
..
Wouter Verhelst writes ("Code of Conduct: picking up"):
> Anyway. The story so far:
> - I posted a draft update of the code of conduct to this list in may[1],
> upon which a short discussion was started
> - It was suggested that the draft wasn't ambitious enough, so I wrote a
> much more ambiti
For clarity:
Op 15-08-13 11:48, Ian Jackson schreef:
> I think the existing draft is far too long. I'd like to propose
> something much shorter:
>
>
> Debian code of conduct
> --
>
> Debian expects everyone to help keep our community welcoming and fun:
>
> * Be respectful.
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 04:47:00PM +0100, Jens Schüßler wrote:
> You have to be a very stupid user who install his system new every now
> and then to be affected by a default desktop at *installation*. And you
> still have the choice to choose whatever bloated DE you want at
> installation time.
P
* Stefan Mauerberger wrote:
> I am nothing but a super stupid user and I do not care what is under the
> hoods. Nevertheless, what I can tell you is that users are expecting
> continuity! I do not want to change all of my habits for every new release.
> Be pragmatic and stay with GNOME3! That is t
On Tue, 05 Nov 2013 15:42:13 +0100, Stefan Mauerberger wrote:
> Hi There!
>
> Just wanted to let you know that from my point of view it is a very bad
> call changing Debian's default desktop once more. (... GNOME2 -> GNOME3
> -> Xfce -> ???)
IIRC, this was discussed days ago¹ on "debian-devel" m
Stefan Mauerberger writes:
> Hi There!
>
> Just wanted to let you know that from my point of view it is a very bad
> call changing Debian's default desktop once more. (... GNOME2 -> GNOME3 ->
> Xfce -> ???)
> I am nothing but a super stupid user and I do not care what is under the
> hoods. Nevert
On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 04:25:21PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> I'd really like to avoid that this were to go down in history as another
> one of my failed projects, so I'm going to try to get it finished ASAP,
> and then propose a GR on the subject.
I love the draft, and I'd be happy to second
Hi all,
First of all, I want to apologise for allowing this to be delayed for so
long. I came home from DebConf to find a number of personal and
professional issues that I had to deal with, which ate away both my time
and my motivation to work much on Debian.
Recently, however, I've spent some ti
Hi There!
Just wanted to let you know that from my point of view it is a very bad
call changing Debian's default desktop once more. (... GNOME2 -> GNOME3 ->
Xfce -> ???)
I am nothing but a super stupid user and I do not care what is under the
hoods. Nevertheless, what I can tell you is that users
]] Stefano Zacchiroli
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 02:51:52PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > > So, what would be the beneficial social effects of publishing the ban
> > > *duration*?
> >
> > The ban duration is an indication of how severe we think the violation
> > is. You don't get a lifetime
16 matches
Mail list logo
