On Sun, 06 Oct 2013, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Ah actually this is because 70096AD1 is not unique, and
> Zack has signed both of them. (I assume Asheesh generated
> the newer key to have the same ID as the older – not nice…
Actually, yes, it is quite nice. Otherwise, all sort of bugs related to
th
Hi,
We will have a DPL helpers meeting tomorrow:
2013-10-09 17:00 UTC (date -d @1381338000) on #debian-dpl
Titanpad with agenda: http://titanpad.com/debiandpl-20131009
(Please update the status of your action items before the meeting if possible)
Lucas
-- copy of the agenda below
Jonathan Dowland writes:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 01:37:36PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Ah, I hadn't ever thought about it from that angle. Basically, the
>> argument is that if there's no original creative addition, it can't be
>> a derivative work? On first glance, 17 U.S.C. § 101 appears
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 01:37:36PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ah, I hadn't ever thought about it from that angle. Basically, the
> argument is that if there's no original creative addition, it can't be a
> derivative work? On first glance, 17 U.S.C. § 101 appears to support
> that:
Eek. What a
On 12/09/13 at 18:38 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
> On Wed, August 28, 2013 18:12, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > ]] Lucas Nussbaum
> >
> >> I like this idea of "max outstanding of $300" instead of an explicit
> >> time limit. But I think that your proposal makes it possible for DSA to
> >> not get re
On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 01:21:50PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> I assume Asheesh generated
> the newer key to have the same ID as the older – not nice…
Yes, http://www.asheesh.org/note/debian/short-key-ids-are-bad-news.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
6 matches
Mail list logo
