On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> In addition to Paul's numbers, we have also the DM keyring, which is
> in a much better shape quite probably because it's much newer.
Good news.
> - Give a suitable time window for the key migration and disable old
> keys. Jonathan gave a f
Russ Allbery dijo [Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 08:57:26PM -0700]:
> I suspect that some of the problem is people feeling like they need to go
> through an in-person key signing to get their new key certified, which can
> be quite awkward depending on where one lives and how much day-to-day
> contact one h
Paul Wise writes:
> There are more people using 1024-bit keys than >= 2048-bit keys (in
> debian-keyring.gpg), many of these are active developers, some not so
> active. It would be a major human resources issue for Debian to disable
> all of those keys but I guess it is the only way to get peopl
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> It has been considered irresponsible to use 1024D keys at this point in
> time.
>
> What are the plans to disable 1024D keys?
There are more people using 1024-bit keys than >= 2048-bit keys (in
debian-keyring.gpg), many of these are
It has been considered irresponsible to use 1024D keys at this point in
time.
What are the plans to disable 1024D keys?
If you think SHA1 is still safe, have a look at the SHA1 decypter tool
at: http://www.md5decrypter.co.uk/sha1-decrypt.aspx
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
style="color:rgb(34,34,34);font-family:arial;font-size:small;font-style:normal;font-variant:normal;font-weight:normal;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;text-align:start;text-indent:0px;text-transform:none;white-space:normal;word-spacing:0px;margin-bottom:0cm">
debian.netstyle="font-famil
6 matches
Mail list logo
