Re: 2nd draft (was: Re: Revising the Code of Conduct)

2013-05-22 Thread Charles Plessy
> On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 07:08:17PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > - I think that we shoud encourage more private replies. For instance, > >"If you want to complain to someone who sent you a carbon copy when > >you did not ask for it, do it privately" (from the current CoC), but also >

Re: 2nd draft (was: Re: Revising the Code of Conduct)

2013-05-22 Thread Brian Gupta
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > So, some updates: > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:59:06AM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote: >> I'm wondering if there can be a guidelines/advice section also? For >> example, perhaps we want to capture something along the lines of (The >> wording ne

Re: 2nd draft (was: Re: Revising the Code of Conduct)

2013-05-22 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 10:52 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: [...] > > > 6. You should avoid sending attachments; this generates a lot of > > >unnecessary bandwidth on our listservers. Instead, put the file you > > >would like to attach online somewhere and post a link. > > > > It may be wort

Re: Revising the Code of Conduct

2013-05-22 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Russ Allbery (21/05/2013): > I've noticed the same pattern as Steve, and it bothers me too, which > means I probably should say something rather than letting this look > like something between you and him. Your interactions on > debian-devel when you do post there, which indeed isn't too > freque

2nd draft (was: Re: Revising the Code of Conduct)

2013-05-22 Thread Wouter Verhelst
So, some updates: On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 11:59:06AM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote: > I'm wondering if there can be a guidelines/advice section also? For > example, perhaps we want to capture something along the lines of (The > wording needs a ton of tweaking): Please remember that Debian is a > multic