On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 09:34:31PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> For that reason, I think that the current name of "DPL helpers" carries a
> suboptimal idea (esp. since some people have been joking about it being "DPL
> slaves/minions"). It's not about helping the DPL, but about helping the
> p
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> As previously announced, the next meeting is tomorrow. [0]
> I've put the agenda on titanpad[1]. If you are listed on one of the pending
> actions, it would be great if you could describe its status, and the possible
> points needing discuss
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:58:27PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:04:34PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> I have been helping to fi
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013, Brian Gupta wrote:
>
>> > Just to make sure: you are talking not about swirl alone, but rather
>> > about swirl + word Debian. Is that correct?
>> Yes, the swirl alone.
>
> Could it be trademarked? I thought tha
On 22/04/13 at 21:34 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> As previously announced, the next meeting is tomorrow. [0]
> [0] April 23, 17 UTC: date -d @1366736400
... on #debian-dpl (irc.debian.org)
Lucas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-project-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscrib
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:58:27PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:04:34PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I have been helping to field trademark inquiries for Debian since late
> >> February, and
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:04:34PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have been helping to field trademark inquiries for Debian since late
>> February, and the issue of our Logo has come up a number of times.
>>
>> Currently, our
Lucas Nussbaum writes ("[dpl-helpers] Future of DPL helpers / meeting on
2013-04-23"):
> I've put the agenda on titanpad[1]. If you are listed on one of the
> pending actions, it would be great if you could describe its status,
> and the possible points needing discussion on titanpad (That should
On Tue, 2013-04-02 at 21:26:18 +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> On 2013-03-26, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > TL;DR: we've been invited to participate into GNOME Outreach Program for
> > Women and I'd like to accept the invitation. To maximize impact, though,
> > we need mentors and topics to complemen
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013, Brian Gupta wrote:
> > Just to make sure: you are talking not about swirl alone, but rather
> > about swirl + word Debian. Is that correct?
> Yes, the swirl alone.
Could it be trademarked? I thought that because of its unfortunately
common origin there is so many of exist
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko
wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Just to make sure: you are talking not about swirl alone, but rather
> about swirl + word Debian. Is that correct?
Yes, the swirl alone.
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013, Brian Gupta wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>
>> I have been helping to
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> > Just to make sure: you are talking not about swirl alone, but rather
> > about swirl + word Debian. Is that correct?
> Both are now open-use.
I was interested which logo was suggested to become a registered Trademark.
--
Yaroslav O. Halchenk
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:13:24PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> Just to make sure: you are talking not about swirl alone, but rather
> about swirl + word Debian. Is that correct?
Both are now open-use. The only non-DFSG free logo would be the bottle
logo, ISTR. (the font is
Hi Brian,
Just to make sure: you are talking not about swirl alone, but rather
about swirl + word Debian. Is that correct?
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013, Brian Gupta wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have been helping to field trademark inquiries for Debian since late
> February, and the issue of our Logo has come
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 04:04:34PM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have been helping to field trademark inquiries for Debian since late
> February, and the issue of our Logo has come up a number of times.
>
> Currently, our logo is not a registered Trademark, but is considered
> (and tr
Hi all,
I have been helping to field trademark inquiries for Debian since late
February, and the issue of our Logo has come up a number of times.
Currently, our logo is not a registered Trademark, but is considered
(and treated by our current Trademark policy) as a "common law"
trademark, in that
Hi,
as I wrote during the campaign, I plan to continue the DPL helpers initiative.
My "vision" for it is a team that drives or monitors important changes inside
the project. That team would be informal (similarly to the QA team): everybody
can feel welcomed, "join", have various/different lev
The following changes to the debian-maintainers keyring have just been
activated:
chopin.si...@gmail.com
Full name: Simon Chopin
Added key: 19FBC4D3DAE94406B13A9DDE19755664855E7273
mar...@bluegap.ch
Full name: Markus Wanner
Added key: F5064876DFE1DAD413F4D4ABE8682D1B3F31E9B3
18 matches
Mail list logo
