Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 and 2.5 ?

2013-01-25 Thread Christoph Egger
Charles Plessy writes: > Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:19:23PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit : >> On 01/25/2013 10:41, Charles Plessy wrote: >> > Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:16:24AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : >> >> On 13102 March 1977, Christoph Egger wrote: >> Alternatively, if we can not

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 and 2.5 ?

2013-01-25 Thread Torsten Werner
Hi, Am 25.01.13 15:07, schrieb Charles Plessy: There are also moin, netcdf-java, vlc, or wxmaxima, which either have an inaccurate copyright file or contain files licensed under CC-BY-(SA-)2.5 (and pinta with by-nc-nd-2.5). Note that I have not tried to be exhaustive in my search. I have to ap

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 and 2.5 ?

2013-01-25 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 01:19:23PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit : > On 01/25/2013 10:41, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:16:24AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : > >> On 13102 March 1977, Christoph Egger wrote: > Alternatively, if we can not find a significant difference

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 and 2.5 ?

2013-01-25 Thread Ansgar Burchardt
On 01/25/2013 10:41, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:16:24AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : >> On 13102 March 1977, Christoph Egger wrote: Alternatively, if we can not find a significant difference of freedom between CC BY 2.5, and CC BY 2.0, how about accepting C

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 and 2.5 ?

2013-01-25 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:16:24AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : > On 13102 March 1977, Christoph Egger wrote: > > >>> When I encounter a work under CC BY 2.0, I have a hard time explaining > >>> Upstream > >>> why it is strictly necessary to upgrade it to 2.5 or more for their work > >>> to be

Re: Can we change our position on CC BY 2.0 ?

2013-01-25 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 13102 March 1977, Christoph Egger wrote: >>> When I encounter a work under CC BY 2.0, I have a hard time explaining >>> Upstream >>> why it is strictly necessary to upgrade it to 2.5 or more for their work to >>> be >>> distributed in Debian. What are the crucial changes that made CC BY 2.5