Le Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:11:54AM +1000, Ben Finney a écrit :
>
> So this is a case where good taste and forthright advocacy are in
> conflict. I think Stefano is correct that good taste is the lesser
> concern here, and that having the README refer directly to free services
> for the job is the
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:31:39AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I have not added links to their competitors, as I think that it would be
> bad taste, but yes, I invite every developer to consider Free alternatives
> such as Gitorious or Branchable.
I find it in poor taste to self-censor due to b
"Thijs Kinkhorst" writes:
> On Thu, June 14, 2012 16:56, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:31:39AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> >> I have not added links to their competitors, as I think that it
> >> would be bad taste, but yes, I invite every developer to consider
> >> F
Yaroslav Halchenko writes:
> BTW -- what would be the license for this creative endeavor?
> (CC BY-SA 3.0?) ;)
I recommend the GNU All-Permissive License for things like this.
http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/License-Notices-for-Other-Files.html
If I really don't want to make people
BTW -- what would be the license for this creative endeavor?
(CC BY-SA 3.0?) ;)
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> I have just submitted a pull request in an attempt to make it more
> factual while staying neutral and informative ;) Here was my take:
> README
> ==
> [Debian](
I have just submitted a pull request in an attempt to make it more
factual while staying neutral and informative ;) Here was my take:
README
==
[Debian](http:www.debian.org) packages, maintains and distributes some
works that are developed using GitHub. This account was created to
facilitat
On Thu, June 14, 2012 16:56, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:31:39AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
>> I have not added links to their competitors, as I think that it would
>> be bad taste, but yes, I invite every developer to consider Free
>> alternatives such as Gitorious or
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 09:31:39AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> I have not added links to their competitors, as I think that it would
> be bad taste, but yes, I invite every developer to consider Free
> alternatives such as Gitorious or Branchable.
To be blunt, I think that our advocacy for soft
8 matches
Mail list logo
