Re: trademark licenses and DFSG

2012-02-18 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 05:28:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Has the project received competent legal advice stating that a package name > would be interpreted as infringing a trademark, and that we might have to > rename it? We have now received such a legal advice. Actually we got two that

Re: OSI affiliation

2012-02-18 Thread MJ Ray
Philip Hands > On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:41:10 +, MJ Ray wrote: > > Jose Luis Rivas > > > Just to give context to your email, could you provide a list with the > > > OSI-approved licenses that you call non-free? (Maybe a link) [...] > > http://people.debian.org/~mjr/legal/fsf-osi-list-diff.txt

Re: OSI affiliation

2012-02-18 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 09:31 +, Philip Hands wrote: > On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:41:10 +, MJ Ray wrote: > > Jose Luis Rivas > > > Just to give context to your email, could you provide a list with the > > > OSI-approved licenses that you call non-free? (Maybe a link) That way > > > every one el

Re: OSI affiliation

2012-02-18 Thread Philip Hands
On Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:41:10 +, MJ Ray wrote: > Jose Luis Rivas > > Just to give context to your email, could you provide a list with the > > OSI-approved licenses that you call non-free? (Maybe a link) That way > > every one else knows which licenses are you talking about exactly. > > http: