On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 03:16:50PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> SPDX uses one short name per combination of license and exception. I did
> not like it at the beginning as I find it inelegant, but in the end it
> would be simpler. With that syntax, ‘GPL-2+ with OpenSSL and Font
> exceptions’ wo
Executive summary for the CCed DEP-5 parser writers (and apologises for those I
forgot): this is about how to signal multiple exceptions to a license.
Le Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 05:33:58PM -0800, Steve Langasek a écrit :
>
> You can always say GPL-2+-with-anything as a custom license name, but the
>
Steve Langasek wrote:
> However, the history of the draft shows that people are concerned
> about knowing whether *specific* common exceptions are in effect
Good point. For example, the "GPL-2 with OpenSSL exception" and
"OpenSSL" licenses are compatible, while GPL-2 and the OpenSSL
licenses are
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 09:16:18AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:21:58PM +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit :
> > copyright-format reads:
> > | Exceptions and clarifications are signaled in plain text, by appending
> > | "with exception" to the short name.
> > However, it is
4 matches
Mail list logo
