On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 08:14:47AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> And what is wrong with just plain "Applications"?
> I think the whole "app
> store" thing is blown out of proportion by the marketing teams of a few
> companies, we do not need to join he hype on this.
I'm personally against hy
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:06:33AM +0200, Jérôme wrote:
> Small Apple "Apps" provide 1 contents and not 1 task, this is redundant
> programming ( a browser for parents, a browser for children, a browser
> for cat...). It's like ou must use vim for editing scripts emacs for
> editing configs and ged
On Thursday 14 April 2011 23.37:16 Steffen Möller wrote:
> On 04/14/2011 11:28 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 09:54:40AM -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> >> I think a case could be made for Debian's apt system being the
> >> original "app store"
> >
> > Yes. That's what I want
and any requests for using "Debian" should ATM be directed to
current DPL: http://wiki.debian.org/DebianProjectLeader
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Ben Finney wrote:
> thomas leclerc writes:
> > according to this page http://www.debian.org/trademark i'd like to
> > send a request for a project & domain
On Thu, 14 Apr 2011, Steffen Möller wrote:
> >And because there was a mail about not accepting the term app store
> >because repository is such a good name: I have no idea whether
> [...]
> How about "Free App Store" ? The double meaning of "Free"
So far I think this was be the best in terms of
Charles Plessy writes:
> I agree with Andreas. After saying “repository” three times I have
> muscle pain in my mouth.
Yes. It's a fine term for precision among fellow geeks, but it's a poor
name for getting recognition by newcomers.
> So our packages are not an application store because we do
Le Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 11:28:44PM +0200, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
> And because there was a mail about not accepting the term app store
> because repository is such a good name: I have no idea whether
> repository is such a good name for native speakers. For non native
> speakers it is not.
H
thomas leclerc writes:
> according to this page http://www.debian.org/trademark i'd like to
> send a request for a project & domain name
That page describes the Debian project's trademark policy. What is your
request?
--
\“But it is permissible to make a judgment after you have |
Le jeudi 14 avril 2011 à 09:54 -0700, Noah Meyerhans a écrit :
> It's funny that you'd say that, because traditionally the Unix
> approach has been to use many small, task-specific "apps", not one big
> monolithic system.
Yes but no （￣～￣;）ウーン・・・
Unix app do 1 task or 1 job useful for any applica
On 04/14/2011 11:28 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 09:54:40AM -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
I think a case could be made for Debian's apt system being the original
"app store"
Yes. That's what I wanted to say in my previous mail!
And because there was a mail about not accept
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 09:54:40AM -0700, Noah Meyerhans wrote:
> I think a case could be made for Debian's apt system being the original
> "app store"
Yes. That's what I wanted to say in my previous mail!
And because there was a mail about not accepting the term app store
because repository is
Hi
according to this page http://www.debian.org/trademark i'd like to send a
request for a project & domain name
but i don't find (or understand) where i can ask for this
can someone help me
thanks
thomas.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 04:11:44PM +0200, Jérôme wrote:
> Why using 100 apps for doing something that 1 browser can doing ? "App
> store" is lineal heir to french "3615 Minitel".
It's funny that you'd say that, because traditionally the Unix approach
has been to use many small, task-specific "apps
Le jeudi 14 avril 2011 à 09:12 +0200, Klistvud a écrit :
> The term "app store" is extremely well established and quite
> univocally defines a store where apps are *sold*. Using the
> term, or any subvariant of the term, is IMHO just bound to rise
> eyebrows and confuse newbies.
>
> Non-newbies
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 05:47:18PM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> My proposal (which is orthogonal) is linking to applications, just to show
> that Debian is not just an operating system as defined on our title page
> ("set of basic programs and utilities that make your computer run.")
It se
Hi,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> io.debian.net, the kfreebsd-i386 porterbox, is back online after we
> exchanged the dead power supply unit.
>
> Nevertheless the root filesystem is currently dirty due to two bad
> sectors on one of the harddisks.
>
> Expect a maintenance downtime of io.debian.net in th
Dne, 13. 04. 2011 14:56:31 je Yaroslav Halchenko napisal(a):
On Wed, 13 Apr 2011, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > My proposal (which is orthogonal) is linking to applications,
just to show
> > that Debian is not just an operating system as defined on our
title page
> > ("set of basic programs and ut
17 matches
Mail list logo
