Re: [DEP5] License field in the first paragraph ?

2011-01-21 Thread Ben Finney
Charles Plessy writes: > Le Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:42:17PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius a écrit : > > > > There seems to be consensus to add an optional License field to the > > first paragraph. […] > > Here is a first attempt. Comments welcome: the discussion was a bit > complex and I am not sure if

Re: [DEP5] License field in the first paragraph ?

2011-01-21 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:42:17PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius a écrit : > > There seems to be consensus to add an optional License field to the > first paragraph. Anyone want to make a patch, and perhaps include some > version of Russ's explanation above as rationale, so that we don't get > endless que

Re: New version of DEP-5 parser

2011-01-21 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Dominique, On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:16:59PM +0100, Dominique Dumont wrote: > I've fixed upstream [1] most (hopefully all) the issues > regarding the DEP5 parser based on Config::Model that > were mentioned on these lists or in the BTS. > The new version is already (thanks gregoa) available

New version of DEP-5 parser

2011-01-21 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hello I've fixed upstream [1] most (hopefully all) the issues regarding the DEP5 parser based on Config::Model that were mentioned on these lists or in the BTS. The new version is already (thanks gregoa) available on Debian/Sid in libconfig-model-perl 1.230 I've updated the parser so as to u

Debian GNU/Linux Romania

2011-01-21 Thread Francesca Ciceri
Hi all, I've take the liberty to forward this message sent to events@d.o by Marius-Bogdan Ursan. As you can see he announces a newborn Romanian Debian community. Good luck Marius and all Romanian crew! Cheers, Francesca - Forwarded message from Ursan Marius Bogdan - Date: Fri, 21 Jan

Re: Debian Linux OS /// Urgent

2011-01-21 Thread Yves-Alexis Perez
On mar., 2011-01-11 at 15:58 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > (with my ANSSI hat on) > > On mar., 2011-01-11 at 10:32 +0100, Treuil, Malvina (GE Healthcare, > consultant) wrote: > > Dear Madam, Dear Sir, The company I work for GEHC buys the software > > containing the following encryption mean

Re: DEP5: Format example patch

2011-01-21 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On to, 2011-01-20 at 09:42 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Agreed to both, but don't underestimate the risks of copy-paste. I > suggest the attached patch, which uses an explicit invalid placeholder > in the examples, hoping it's clear enough that it's a placeholder. Applied, thanks. -- Blog

Re: Squirrelmail package availability question

2011-01-21 Thread Adrian von Bidder
On Thursday 20 January 2011 22.50:03 Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > In this specific case, there has been a concern in the past that making a > package for really small things, like a plugin that's just one short > file, would be overkill. But if you ask me, there's always some way to > deal with such c