On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 03:36:11PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> I honestly have had a hard time following the discussion here on the
> mailinglist due to not easily being able to see our "whiteboard" of
> the progressing draft. If everyone else involved (in _developing_ the
> DEP - use of it is
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 08:20:26PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 09:55:59AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
Half-baked versions of the format, not really controlled by anyone,
have been floating around for a long while.
Dear Stefano and everybody,
In a first devel
On Thursday 23 December 2010 12:51:59 Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> I, personally, think it would be better to wait for the first version of
> DEP5 that is marked CANDIDATE, which I intend to announce on
> debian-devel-announce. Hopefully that will happen quite soon. Those who
> already use some revision
On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:51:59 +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> Those who
> already use some revision, such as pkg-perl, should stick to what they
> are using now.
Agreed, and the fact that r135 in svn hasn't changed for some time
(and the development happened somewhere else) was actually helpful for
thanks - looking forward to the announcement!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On to, 2010-12-23 at 12:34 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for those who are just marking mails in this thread as read... ;-)
>
> On Donnerstag, 23. Dezember 2010, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Using revision 135 of the DEP from svn.debian.org is a waste of time, for
> > the people who would li
On to, 2010-12-23 at 09:55 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> So, let's get back to the basic principles at stake. The point hardly is
> Bzr vs SVN; rather it seems to be whether the working draft of a DEP
> should be constantly updated and trivially accessible, for instance on
> the web at the can
Hi,
for those who are just marking mails in this thread as read... ;-)
On Donnerstag, 23. Dezember 2010, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Using revision 135 of the DEP from svn.debian.org is a waste of time, for
> the people who would like to write a copyright file, or for the peopole who
> would like to
Le Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 09:55:59AM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
>
> Half-baked versions of the format, not really controlled by anyone, have been
> floating around for a long while.
Dear Stefano and everybody,
In a first development phase, the wiki was used, the contents were
peer-control
On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 06:23:10PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> In my opinion, DEP5 is a work in progress, and as such discouraged
>>> for general consumption. This is indicated my its status as
>>> "DRAFT".
>
>>I concur.
>
> If only for this specific process then I agree it is of little va
[ M-F-T to lea...@d.o for volunteering ]
I've received more details about this. There are now on board people
from Fedora, openSUSE, Ubuntu, Mageia. The plan is to have a 2-3 days
face to face meeting in Nürnberg (Germany) during the 3rd week of
January 2011. Later on discussions will be moved to
11 matches
Mail list logo
