Craig Small writes:
> This is the collecting part I hope is cleared up. Do something like
> grep -i copyright `find . -name '*.[ch]'`
> over a non trivial project, especially one that has been around for
> years and you get all sorts of wonderful combinations.
> The globbing Charles suggested a
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:35:23PM +0100, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On to, 2010-10-28 at 19:58 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Would ‘Copyright 2008, 2009, 2010 John Smith, Angela Watts’ be also
> > acceptable ?
> > Especially if the situation is:
> >
> > Copyright 2008 John Smith
> > Copy
On to, 2010-10-28 at 19:58 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> It may be confusing that the header paragraph Copyright field has not the same
> format as the files paragraph Copyright fields (‘line based list’). Perpaps
> people writing parsers may comment on this as well…
That was a bug. Fixed.
> Sin
Le Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:15:19AM +0100, Lars Wirzenius a écrit :
Hi Lars, Russ, everybody…
I have two comments and a question:
> === modified file 'dep5.mdwn'
> --- dep5.mdwn 2010-09-23 12:40:46 +
> +++ dep5.mdwn 2010-10-28 10:14:33 +
> @@ -167,6 +167,15 @@
> from a version known
This is continuing the discussion from 2.5 months ago.
On la, 2010-08-14 at 10:04 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Steve Langasek writes:
> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 04:13:57PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
>
> >> We should say explicitly that the copyright field is a rollup of all
> >> relevant copyrig
5 matches
Mail list logo
